Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 18;2019(3):CD011269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011269.pub3

Comparison 2. Infrared light therapy versus no light therapy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Incidence of SAD (per protocol analysis) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Incidence of SAD (ITT, assuming no dropout was depressed) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Incidence of SAD (ITT, assuming all dropouts were depressed) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Incidence of severe SAD (per protocol analysis) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Incidence of severe SAD (ITT, assuming no dropout was depressed) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Incidence of severe SAD (ITT, assuming all dropouts were depressed) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Overall rate of discontinuation 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected