Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 10;21(4):428–439. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy186

Table 1.

Test characteristics for the detection of leptomeningeal metastases in breast cancer patients by using CSF biomarkers

Ref. Method Number of Patients with LM from BC versus LM from all tumor types Biomarker Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Definition of LM Definition Control Group (no. of patients)
Pro-angiogenic proteins
Stockhammer et al19 ELISA VEGF 4 out of 11 VEGF NA NA NA NA Clinical signs, MRI findings, and positive CSF cytology I: Pts with solid malignancies without LM (16) II: Pts with infectious meningitis (35) III: Pts with nonmalignant and noninfectious diseases (100)
Corsini et al20 ELISA VEGF 11 out of 18 VEGF index (cutoff 10) 83.3 88.4 NA NA Positive CSF cytology Non-malignant neurological diseases: inflammatory (33), neurodegenerative (17)
Herrlinger et al21 ELISA VEGF 5 out of 37 VEGF (cutoff 100 pg/mL) VEGF (cutoff 250 pg/mL) 73 51.4 93 98.3 77.1 90.5 91.5 86.3 Positive CSF cytology, or contrast-enhancing subarachnoid tumor cell deposits on MRI or both Non-malignant neurological disease (50), multiple sclerosis (28), presumed CNS infectious disease (37)
Reijneveld et al22 ELISA VEGF 31 out of 53 VEGF NA NA NA NA Clinical features compatible with LM and positive CSF cytology I:Pts with malignancies without LM (negative CSF and no signs of LM or brain metastases on imaging) (18) II: No malignancy (no systemic malignancy, no CNS infection, no signs of LM or brain metastases on imaging) (25)
Langerijt, van de et al23 ELISA VEGF, tPA 9 out of 19 VEGF index tPA index VEGF + tPA 54a/62b 85a/85b
100
72a/71b 79a/96b
73
54 100 Positive CSF cytology and/or enhancement of leptomeninges on MRI I: Pts with solid malignancy (negative cytology and MRI) (54) = a II: Infectious meningitis: viral (16), bacterial (16), nonmalignant and noninfectious neurologic disorders (27) = b
Groves et al24 ELISA VEGF 8 out of 22 VEGF (all tumor types) VEFG (BC) 71
75
97
97
88
86
91
94
Positive CSF cytology I: BC (33), lung (25), melanoma (9) pts suspected for LM with negative CSF cytology. II: No disease at all (1)
CK-BB, LDH, β2-microglobulin
Bach et al25 CK-BB bio-luminescence assay 12 out of 12 CK-BB (cutoff 0.2 U/l) LDH (cutoff 80 U/l) 83 50 87 77 60 38 96 92 Positive CSF cytology or LM at autopsy less than 1 month after assayed CSF I: BC pts with brain metastases (18). II: BC pts without CNS metastases (34)
Twijnstra et al26 LDH with ACA method 15 out of 15 β2-microglobulin
(cutoff >2.2 mg/l) LDH (cutoff >26 U/l)
60 60 88 93 NA NA NA NA Positive CSF cytology (13) or LM at autopsy (2) Neurological disorders without CNS metastases (16)
Twijnstra et al27 LDH with ACA method 15 out of 34 LDH (cutoff >26 U/l) 79 83 33 83 Positive CSF cytology (32) or LM at autopsy (2) I: Pts with solid tumors (66), hematological tumors (10), benign primary CNS tumors (7), malignant primary CNS tumors (10), others (112) II: Controls (110)
CA15.3, CEA
Le Rhun et al28 CSF CA15.3 Automatized immuno-enzymatic technology 20 out of 20 CA 15.3
(cutoff 3 UI/mL)
80 70 NA NA Positive CSF cytology or clinical signs in combination with positive MRI I: LM from other cancers than BC (20) (group 2). II: BC pts with brain metastases only (20) (group 3). III: No malignancy (20) (group 4)
Yap et al29 Triple-isotope double antibody method 23 out of 23 CEA
(cutoff 1.5 ng/mL)
70 100 NA NA Positive CSF cytology and absence of parenchymal brain metastases on CT Stage IV BC pts and no evidence of metastatic CNS disease (10)
Corsini et al20 CEA, CA15.3, CA125, CA19.9 (Modular Analytics SWA) 11 out of 18 Intrathecal synthesis of CEA/CA 15.3/CA125/ CA19.9 100 100 NA NA Positive CSF cytology Nonmalignant neurological diseases: inflammatory (33), neurodegenerative (17)
Twijnstra et al26 CEA 15 out of 15 CEA (cutoff >4 ng/mL) 60 93 - - Positive CSF cytology or LM at autopsy Neurological disorders without CNS metastases (16)
Proteomics
Dekker et al30 MALDI-TOF MS 54 out of 54 79 76 NA NA Positive CSF cytology or a compatible neurological syndrome and diagnostic MRI I: BC pts with negative cytology and follow- up incompatible with LM (54). II: No cancer and no neurological disease
EpCAM-based assays
Nayak et al31 CellSearch 7 out of 15 Cutoff: presence of CSFTC 100 97.2 93.8 100 Positive CSF cytology or positive MRI findings observed within 1 month of the initial evaluation I: Pts with clinical suspicion of LM (36). II: Nonmalignant neurologic disease (9)
Lee et al32 CellSearch 18 out of 18 Cutoff >1.9 cells/mL 81 85 NA NA Positive CSF cytology I: Non-malignant neurologic disease (14).II: BC pts with negative cytology (20)
Lin et al33 CellSearch 14 out of 30 Cutoff ≥1 cell/mL 93 95 90 97 Positive CSF cytology or unequivocal MRI findings performed within a month of the CSF analysis. Unequivocal MRI findings defined as: LM enhancement associated with subarchnoid nodules, basal cistern enhancement, or nerve root enhancement/clumping. Cancer pts with clinical suspicion of LM without LM confirmation (65)
Kerklaan et al34 EpCAM FCI 7 out of 13 Cutoff ≥2 CSFTC/ 5 mL CSF 100 100 NA NA Positive CSF cytology or a MRI with positive MRI or progressive neurological symptoms compatible with LM and exclusion of other causes Cancer pts with clinical suspicion of LM without LM confirmation (16)
Subirá et al35 EpCAM FCI 32 out of 49 Cutoff 10 clustered events 75.5 96.1 97.4 67.6 Positive CSF cytology or the combination of clinical signs and either MRI or biochemical CSF findings Cancer pts with clinical suspicion of LM in whom LM was excluded (26)
Subirá et al36 EpCAM FCI 39 out of 94 Cutoff 16 clustered events 79.8 84 90.36 68.85 Positive CSF cytology and/or compatible clinical signs plus MRI findings with biochemical CSF abnormalities Cancer pts with clinical suspicion of LM in whom LM was excluded (50)
ctDNA
Bougel et al37 Methylation of hTERT with MS-HRM 8 out of 9 Methylation hTERT 92 100 100 95 Positive CSF cytology No malignancy (21)

Abbreviations: MS-HRM = methylation-sensitive high resolution melting; NA = not available; pts = patients.

aSensitivity and specificity to discriminate LM from LM negatives.

bSensitivity and specificity to discriminate LM from control patients.