Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 17;21(4):527–536. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz004

Table 3.

Predictive modeling performance

Metric Variables (#) Conventional Conventional Plus Advanced
R2 All variables 0.508 ± 0.093 (6) 0.660 ± 0.201 (23)
RF rank 0.504 ± 0.065 (4) 0.749 ± 0.137 (4)
RF (fixed variables) 0.496 ± 0.083 (T2, T1C, FLAIR, T1) 0.747 ± 0.168 (T2, FA, CBF, Ktrans)
RMSE (%) All variables 5.34 ± 2.25 4.19 ± 1.78
RF rank 5.47 ± 2.33 3.85 ± 1.82
RF (fixed variables) 5.40 ± 2.34 3.46 ± 1.39
Max error across all folds (%) All variables 30.50 27.03
RF rank 28.94 24.93
RF (fixed variables) 28.75 20.49

RF = random forest. Summary of the performance of the random forest model using variables selected by random forest rankings. Accuracy was estimated using 5-fold cross validation. Conventional = conventional MR only (T1, T2, T1 contrast enhanced, FLAIR, SWAN, T2*). Conventional plus advanced = conventional imaging plus diffusion, permeability and perfusion imaging. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of variables included to obtain the predictive performance stated (see text).