Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;10:217. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00217

Table 6.

Overview of selected studies in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage.

Study Type of study N (% IVH) Outcome scale Follow-up (months) Results Notes
ICH WITH/WITHOUT IVH (NO SEVERITY GRADING)
Tuhrim et al. (10) Prospective 129 (36%) Mortality rates 1 42.5 vs. 8.5% No cutoff identified
Steiner et al. (21) Prospective 374 (45%) Poor functional outcome (mRS ≥4) 3 56.7 vs. 24.5% No cutoff identified
Bhattathiri et al. (22) Prospective 902 (42%) Favorable functional outcome (GOS ≥4) 6 31vs. 15% (p < 0.00001), when IVH absent vs. present No cutoff identified
Hallevi et al. (7) Retrospective 406 (45%) Poor functional outcome (mRS ≥4) 3 OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 2.21–5.09 (p < 0.0001) No cutoff identified
Bhatia et al. (12) Prospective 214 (48%) Mortality predictor Hospital discharge OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.31–5.41 (p = 0.007) No cutoff identified
Mustanoja et al. (13) Prospective 967 (41%) Mortality rates 3 54 vs. 18% (p < 0.001) No cutoff identified
ICH WITH/WITHOUT IVH (GRADED BASED ON SEVERITY)
Morgan et al. (25) Databank 1,250 (32%) Poor functional outcome (mRS ≥3) 3 Increasing modified Graeb scores correlate with poor outcome. OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.16 (p < 0.0001) Modified Graeb Score used as a continuous variable No cutoff identified
ICH WITH/WITHOUT IVH (GRADED BASED ON DEFINED SEVERITY CUTOFFS)
Godoy et al. (23) Prospective 153 (48%) Rate of favorable functional outcome (GOS ≥4) 6 36.4 vs. 14.7% vs. 16.7% for Graeb scores of 1–4, 5–8, and 9–12, respectively (p = 0.20) Graeb score 1–4 vs. 5–8 vs. 9–12 Included patients with infratentorial and supratentorial location
Nishikawa et al. (9) Retrospective 100 (35%) Functional outcome (KPS 50–100) hospital discharge OR = 3.96, 95% CI = 0.90–17.38; (p = 0.068) Graeb score ≤ 5 vs. >5
Hansen et al. (6) Prospective 198 (43%) Survival and poor functional outcome (mRS ≥4) 1 and 3 Increasing modified Graeb scores correlate with 30 days survival, OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.06–1.27 (p = 0.002) and poor outcome OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02–1.20 (p = 0.011) Survival was analyzed by modified Graeb scores divided into quartiles: the third and fourth quartiles had worse survival vs. first and second quartiles

GOS, Glasgow Outcome Score; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.