Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;7(3):e11437. doi: 10.2196/11437

Table 2.

Detailed diagnostic performance of the photoplethysmography technology for atrial fibrillation screening in different smart devices.

Index Smart bands Mobile phones Mobile phone 1 Mobile phone 2
Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 95.36 (92.00-97.40) 94.96 (91.51-97.11) 94.41 (88.91-97.38) 95.56 (90.16-98.18)
Specificity, % (95% CI) 99.70 (98.08-99.98) 99.70 (98.07-99.98) 100 (97.20-100) 99.40 (96.18-99.97)
PPVa, % (95% CI) 99.63 (97.61-99.98) 99.62 (97.59-99.98) 100 (96.55-100) 99.23 (95.16-99.96)
NPVb, % (95% CI) 96.24 (93.50-97.90) 95.95 (93.15-97.68) 95.43 (90.88-97.86) 96.49 (92.17-98.57)
Accuracy, % (95% CI) 97.72 (96.11-98.70) 97.55 (95.89-98.57) 97.42 (94.78-98.80) 97.67 (95.05-98.97)

aPPV: positive predictive value.

bNPV: negative predictive value.