Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 16;5(3):e01351. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01351

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons of HRV by observation Interval with corrected significance in Study 1.

(I) Interval (J) Interval Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error df Bonferroni Sig. 95% Wald Confidence Interval for Difference
Lower Upper
Baseline Exercise #1 .0902a .02396 1 .001*** .0270 .1535
Exercise #2 .0096 .03180 1 1.000 -.0743 .0935
Endpoint -.1791a .03553 1 .000*** -.2728 -.0854
Exercise #1 Baseline -.0902a .02396 1 .001*** -.1535 -.0270
Exercise #2 -.0807a .02561 1 .010** -.1482 -.0131
Endpoint -.2693a .03320 1 .000*** -.3569 -.1817
Exercise #2 Baseline -.0096 .03180 1 1.000 -.0935 .0743
Exercise #1 .0807a .02561 1 .010** .0131 .1482
Endpoint -.1887a .03720 1 .000*** -.2868 -.0905
Endpoint Baseline .1791a .03553 1 .000*** .0854 .2728
Exercise #1 .2693a .03320 1 .000*** .1817 .3569
Exercise #2 .1887a .03720 1 .000*** .0905 .2868

Note: (a) – Significant difference at p < .05; *p < .05; **p ≤ .01; ***p ≤ .001.