Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 16;5(3):e01351. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01351

Table 5.

Pairwise comparisons of EDA by interval with corrected significance in Study 1.

(I) Interval (J) Interval Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error df Bonferroni Sig. 95% Wald Confidence Interval for Difference
Lower Upper
Baseline Exercise #1 .1805a .05922 1 .014* .0243 .3368
Exercise #2 .0600 .08106 1 1.000 -.1538 .2739
Endpoint -.4867a .06344 1 .000*** -.6541 -.3194
Exercise #1 Baseline -.1805a .05922 1 .014* -.3368 -.0243
Exercise #2 -.1205 .06505 1 .384 -.2921 .0512
Endpoint -.6673a .08651 1 .000*** -.8955 -.4390
Exercise #2 Baseline -.0600 .08106 1 1.000 -.2739 .1538
Exercise #1 .1205 .06505 1 .384 -.0512 .2921
Endpoint -.5468a .07072 1 .000*** -.7334 -.3602
Endpoint Baseline .4867a .06344 1 .000*** .3194 .6541
Exercise #1 .6673a .08651 1 .000*** .4390 .8955
Exercise #2 .5468a .07072 1 .000*** .3602 .7334

Note: (a) – Significant difference at p < .05; *p < .05; ***p < .001.