TABLE.
Variables | Literature-Based Data for Patient Referral and PDPT |
Program-Based Data for DIS Referral |
---|---|---|
Number of index patients | Number enrolled at baseline in study or evaluation | Number of patients interviewed in STD clinic |
Number of partners | Total number of partners claimedb | Total number of partners claimedb |
Number of partners notified | Self-report from enrollee (occasional partner corroboration) | Disposition codesc
A: Preventive treatment B: Refused preventative treatment C: Infected, brought to treatment D: Infected, not treated E: Previously treated F: Not infected J: Located, refused testing or treatment |
Number of partners treated (or other action indicating partner health is assured) | Self-report from enrollee (occasional partner corroboration) | Disposition codes A: Preventive treatment C: Infected, brought to treatment E: Previously treated F: Not infected |
Notification statistics | ||
(1) Proportion | (1) Number notified/number of partners | |
(2) Index | (2) Number notified/number of index patients | |
Treatment index | ||
(1) Proportion | (1) Numbertreated/number of partners | |
(2) Index | (2) Numbertreated/number of index patients |
Abbreviations: DIS, disease intervention specialist; PDPT, patient-delivered partner therapy; STD, sexually transmitted disease.
The number of gonorrhea-infected patients interviewed is not necessarily the total number of gonorrhea-infected cases because not all clinics interview all cases.
Total numbers of partners are not necessarily exclusive because multiple index patients or study enrollees could claim the same partner. The extent to which there is overlap is rarely known.
Each of these codes used by STD programs to indicate the outcomes of partner services indicates that the partner was notified by someone even if no other disease intervention took place. With disposition E, the route to notification or treatment may not have been through DIS (other than through assuring treatment took place).