Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 19;2019(3):CD011847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011847.pub2

Comparison 1. ECT plus standard care versus sham‐ECT plus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mental state ‐ total score (BPRS, high = poor) ‐ short term 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.60 [‐3.69, 10.89]
2 Service use ‐ number readmitted ‐ short term 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.10, 0.85]