Comparison 6. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: ECT plus standard care versus standard care (ASSUMPTIONS FOR LOST BINARY DATA).

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Response to treatment ‐ clinically significant response (as defined by each study) ‐ medium term	9		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
1.1 With assumption	9	819	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.06 [1.75, 2.42]
1.2 Without assumption	9	816	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.06 [1.75, 2.42]