Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 5;2017(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2

Arnold 2016.

Methods Allocation: randomised
Blinding: double‐blind
Controlled: placebo
Centre: multi
Arm: 2 arms, parallel groups
Imputation: BOCF
Study dates: 55‐month trial (May 2010 to December 2014)
Participants Inclusion criteria: adolescents with fibromyalgia, Yunus and Masi diagnostic criteria, mean daily pain rating NRS score of ≥ 4 (0 to 10).
Exclusion criteria: pain due to other conditions, systemic inflammatory MSK disorders, rheumatic diseases other than fibromyalgia, serious active infections, untreated endocrine disorders, prior participation in a clinical trial of pregabalin, history of failed treatment with pregabalin, mental health conditions, active malignancy, immunocompromised, or history of drug abuse.
Baseline characteristics
N = 107
Age: 12 to 17 years
Gender: male (15); female (92)
Number randomised: intervention (54); placebo (53)
Number completed: intervention (44); placebo (36)
Setting and location: 36 centres in the USA (28), India (5), Taiwan (2), and Czech Republic (1)
Interventions Intervention group (N = 54): flexible‐dose pregabalin 75 to 450 mg/day
Control group (N = 53): flexible‐dose placebo 75 to 450 mg/day
Study duration: 15 weeks' duration including 4 phases: doses were optimised over 3 weeks based on efficacy and tolerability to 75, 150, 300, 450 mg/day. Remaining at that dose for 12 weeks.
Outcomes Primary outcomes
  1. Mean pain score (NRS 0 to 10)


Secondary outcomes
  1. Change in pain score by week

  2. Change in pain score at week 15

  3. PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change)

Notes Sources of funding: sponsored by Pfizer. Medical writing support was provided. Trial registrations: NCT01020474; NCT01020526.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive pregabalin or matched placebo according to a computer‐generated pseudo‐random code using the method of random permuted blocks."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "this was a double‐blind study", "pregabalin or matched placebo was administered twice daily"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Under this approach, a blinded assessment of the change in mean pain score of the 95 subjects who had been randomized at that point was conducted"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: all participants were accounted for.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all planned outcomes listed in the methods were reported in the results.
Size High risk Comment: total participants > 50 per treatment arm randomised. Participants < 50 per treatment arm completed.
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: see notes above for details on Pfizer funding.