Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;15(3):e1007385. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007385

Table 2. Etest assessments of cell envelope integrity.

FA1090 background WHO X background
WTa ΔmlaAa ΔmlaA/Plac::pldAa WTa ΔmlaAa
Polymyxin B 64 32 16 128 8
Vancomycin 8 4 4 16 8
Ceftriaxoneb N/D N/D N/D 1.0d 1.0
Cefiximeb N/D N/D N/D 2.0d 2.0
Azithromycin 0.064 0.064 1.0c N/D N/D
Cefotaxime 0.004 0.004 0.004 N/D N/D
Ampicillin 0.125 0.064 0.125 N/D N/D
Tetracycline 0.125 0.125 0.125 N/D N/D
Benzylpenicillin 0.064 0.064 0.064 N/D N/D
Gentamicin 4 4 4 N/D N/D
Tobramycin 8 8 8 N/D N/D
Ceftazidime 0.032 0.032 0.032 N/D N/D

aMIC values are presented in μg/mL.

bPreliminary testing indicated FA1090 was too sensitive to this antibiotic for the MIC to be evaluated with Etests.

cVector for PldA overexpression encodes erythromycin resistance, which also provides resistance against azithromycin.

dPrior MIC determination performed on solid medium supplemented with hemoglobin and IsoVitalex [26]. N/D, not determined.