Table 1. Comparison of Performance of Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI.
| Sardanelli et al. (15) | Kuhl et al. (16) | Lehman et al. (17) | Kuhl et al. (18) | Leach et al. (19) | Leach et al. (19) | Warner et al. (20) | Morris et al. (21) | Vreemann et al. (22) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study period | 2000–2007 | 2002–2005 | 2005 | 1996–2002 | 1997–2004 | 1997–2003 | 2000–2001 | 2003–2014 |
| Number of participants | 501 | 687 | 195 | 529 | 648 | 256 | 367 | 2463 |
| Number of cancers | 52 | 27 | 6 | 43 | 35 | 22 | 14 | 170 |
| Sensitivity (%) | ||||||||
| MRI | 91 | 93 | 100 | 93 | 77 | 77 | 100 | 81.4 |
| Mammography | 50 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 36 | 0 | 51.7 |
| US | 52 | 37 | 17 | 40 | NA | 33 | NA | NA |
| PPV (%) | ||||||||
| MRI | 65 | 48 | 43 | 50 | 7 | 49 | 17 | 28 |
| Mammography | 71 | 39 | 50 | 23 | 10 | 83 | NA | 40 |
| US | 62 | 33 | 25 | 11 | NA | 23 | NA | NA |
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, NA = not available, PPV = positive predictive value, US = ultrasonography