Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;10:121. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00121

Table 4.

Meta-regression analysis of heterogeneity for overall survival.

Moderators Variables of regression HRinteraction (95% CI) P-value of regression I2 Cochrane Q (P-value)
Year Year 1.001(0.990–1.012) 0.840 81.69% < 0.001
Sample size Sample size 2.578(0.674–9.860) 0.166 43.18% 0.152
Follow up Follow up 0.741(0.076–7.236) 0.796 72.89% < 0.001
Country Intercept 1.648(1.291–2.104) < 0.001 71.56% < 0.001
Germany 1.001(0.334–2.997) 0.999 71.56% < 0.001
Hungary 0.388(0.143–1.051) 0.063 71.56% < 0.001
Iran 1.523(0.380–6.105) 0.553 71.56% < 0.001
Japan 1.134(0.463–2.775) 0.783 71.56% < 0.001
Korea 1.079(0.695–1.675) 0.736 71.56% < 0.001
Netherlands 0.600(0.285–1.263) 0.178 71.56% < 0.001
Spain 1.330(0.405–4.374) 0.638 71.56% < 0.001
USA 0.605(0.302–1.215) 0.158 71.56% < 0.001
Tumor type Intercept 1.716(1.055–2.792) 0.030 75.22% < 0.001
Colorectal cancer 0.543(0.293–1.008) 0.053 75.22% < 0.001
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma 2.786(0.559–13.892) 0.211 75.22% < 0.001
Endometrial carcinoma 0.629(0.082–4.849) 0.657 75.22% < 0.001
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1.044(0.412–2.640) 0.928 75.22% < 0.001
Gastric Cancer 0.851(0.442–1.638) 0.630 75.22% < 0.001
Hepatocellular Carcinoma 1.168(0.574–2.373) 0.668 75.22% < 0.001
Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas 0.326(0.078–1.370) 0.126 75.22% < 0.001
NSCLC 1.071(0.521–2.204) 0.852 75.22% < 0.001
Osteosarcoma 0.960(0.384–2.399) 0.930 75.22% < 0.001
Ovarian cancer 1.135(0.478–2.692) 0.774 75.22% < 0.001
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 0.961(0.294–3.144) 0.948 75.22% < 0.001
Pelvis chondrosarcoma 0.711(0.080–6.345) 0.760 75.22% < 0.001
Renal cell carcinoma 2.208(0.520–9.383) 0.283 75.22% < 0.001
Soft tissue sarcoma 5.863(1.115–30.823) 0.037 75.22% < 0.001
Uterine cervical cancer 0.880(0.208–3.727) 0.862 75.22% < 0.001
Race Intercept 1.705(1.414–2.056) < 0.001 73.32% < 0.001
Caucasian 0.619(0.411–0.932) 0.022 73.32% < 0.001
Sample type Intercept 1.430(0.353–5.799) 0.617 81.72% < 0.001
Tissue 1.097(0.267–4.510) 0.898 81.72% < 0.001

HRinteraction, interaction effect calculated by meta-regression; Positive direction indicates that possible moderators might strengthen OS in the SIRT1 overexpression relative to underexpression. Bold italics indicate statistically significant values (P < 0.05).