. 2018 Jul 23;26(1):305–314. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1

Table 1.

Statistical outcomes, right-handers no-strategy (N = 43)

(a) Hand choice
A-1: History	A-2: History by target eccentricity
DV: PSE values	DV: Arcsine transformed p(RHU)
Test: Paired-samples t test	Test: RM-ANOVA History (2) × Target Position (5)
N = 40, outlier removed	N = 40, outlier removed
Left-prime − right-prime: t(40) = 3.48, p< .005	Main effect: History: F(1, 39) = 9.88, p< .005
	Main effect: Target position: F(4, 36) = 10.53, p< .001*
	Interaction: F(4, 36) = 5.88, p< .001*
	*Greenhouse–Geisser applied
A-3: History by (PSE/Extreme) target position
DV: Arcsine transformed p(RHU)
Test: RM-ANOVA History (2) × Target Position (2)
N = 42, outlier removed
Main effect: History: F(1, 41) = 15.8, p< .001
Main effect: Target location: F(1, 41) = 2.68, p = .11
Interaction: F(1, 41) = 18.4, p< .001
(b) Response times
B-1: History by hand	B-2: History by (PSE/Extreme) target position
DV: RTs	DV: RTs
Test: RM-ANOVA Hand (2) × History (2)	Test: RM-ANOVA History (2) × Target Position (2)
N = 42, outlier removed	N = 43, no outliers detected
Main effect: Hand: F(1, 41) = 0.59, p = .45	Main effect: History: F(1, 42) = 4.96, p< .05
Main effect: History: F(1, 41) = 41.0, p< .001	Main effect: Target location: F(1, 42) = 154.2, p< .001
Interaction: F(1, 41) = 2.31, p = .14	Interaction: F(1, 42) = 0.53, p = .47
(c) Choice hysteresis and RT hysteresis
DV: PSE and RTs
Test: Linear regression
N = 40, outlier removed
ANOVA: F(1, 38) = 4.42, p< .05; R² = .11
Pearson correlation = 0.32
Cook’s distance, max = 0.44
Durbin–Watson = 1.77

Bolded text highlight tests that reach significance