Table 2.

Sample descriptive statistics

	Full sample		Involved In psychosocial evaluation		Not involved in psychosocial evaluation
	N	Per cent	N	Per cent	N	Per cent
Total	584		282	48.3	302	51.7
Gender (n=489)
Male	257	52.7	82	14.4	175	30.0
Female	232	47.4	160	27.4	72	12.3
UNOS region (n=462)
Region 1	49	10.6	23	3.9	26	4.5
Region 2	54	11.7	22	3.8	32	5.5
Region 3	25	5.4	12	2.1	13	2.2
Region 4	36	7.8	24	4.1	12	2.1
Region 5	62	13.5	31	5.3	31	5.3
Region 6	23	4.8	10	1.7	12	2.1
Region 7	40	8.6	19	3.3	21	3.6
Region 8	33	7.2	13	2.2	20	3.4
Region 9	29	6.3	15	2.6	14	2.4
Region 10	48	10.4	26	4.5	22	3.8
Region 11	63	13.7	36	6.2	27	4.6
Organ programme*
Kidney	418	71.6	180	30.8	238	40.8
Liver	309	52.9	114	19.5	195	33.4
Heart	84	14.4	65	11.1	19	3.3
Lung	44	7.5	26	4.5	18	3.1
Pancreas	226	38.7	81	13.9	145	24.8
Other	54	9.3	28	4.8	26	4.5
Confident in listing guidelines (n=419)
Confident	178	30.5	176	30.1	134	22.9
Not confident	241	41.3	94	16.1	144	24.7
Believe using social support in listing is fair (n=562)
Agree	422	72.3	214	36.6	200	34.2
Disagree	79	13.5	24	4.1	55	9.4
Neutral	61	10.5	34	5.8	35	6.0
Believe using social support in listing is important to avoid organ waste (n=560)
Agree	392	67.1	193	33.0	197	33.7
Disagree	54	9.2	26	4.5	28	4.8
Neutral	114	19.5	51	8.7	63	10.8
	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
Years in practice (n=484)	16.5	11.2	16.1	10.9	16.9	11.4
Years in transplantation (n=486)	13.5	10.4	11.3	9.8	16.1	10.4
Average psychosocial evaluations per month (n=238)	19.9	20.2	20.0	20.4	0	N/A

Percentages are of full sample (n=584) and may add up to <100% as responses to questions were not required. Remaining respondents did not answer the question.

^*Percentage may add up to >100%, as respondents were allowed to select multiple organs.