Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2018 Nov 23;90:334–340. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.031

Table 2.

Predicting change in carbon monoxide levels from Baseline to Abstinence and Return-to-Baseline phases using measures of impulsive behavior.

Condition Measure Phase Measure × Phase Measure × Condition Condition × Phase Measure × Condition × Phase
Breath carbon monoxide
Go/Stop task: stop signal delay, F 2.01  < 0.01  < 0.01 0.13 0.87 0.40 0.71
Delay Discounting: AUC, F 3.50 0.87 0.40  <0.01 4.62* 1.20 1.21
Continuous Performance Task: omissions, F 2.31  < 0.01 0.13  < 0.01 0.86 0.11 0.03
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale—Adolescent, F 3.11 0.99 1.94 1.71 0.99 4.45* 4.72*
Treatment adherence
Go/Stop task: SSRT, F 7.80** 0.56 0.60
Delay Discounting: AUC, F 9.82** 15.61*** 0.07
Continuous Performance Task: omissions, F 0.38 0.13 2.53
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale—Adolescent, F 1.01 0.19 0.08
“—”

= not applicable” for that model; AUC = area under the curve;

= Impulsive behavior measure for that respective row; All values displayed are F values;

*

p ≤ .05,

**

p ≤ .01,

***

p ≤ .001.