Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Liq. 2017 Nov 21;270:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.106

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Left panel: theoretical correlation of the Huggins constant kH, Eq. (21), and the second virial coefficient B22, for the conditions of Fig. 3 and Fig. S1 – colors from cold to hot correspond to different temperatures. Note that both quantities are valid for dilute protein solutions, in our case this is up to 90 mg/mL. Right panel: correlation between the viscosities and second virial coefficients, B22, at T = 20 °C and γ = 150 mg/mL. (i) ηB22 theoretical correlation for antistreptavidin IgG1 solutions studied above: viscosities ( Inline graphic) correspond to fits in Fig. 3 and Fig. S1 and are correlated with B22 values from the left panel for solutions with different pH and concentration of NaCl. The green line is the best least–square fit through the data. (ii) experimentally measured correlation of Saito et al [59] for mAb–A (●), mAb–B (×), and mAb–C (Δ) solutions. Black lines serve to guide the eye.