Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 24;8:213. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17916.1

Figure 5. Causes of rejection by RATs of results reported by SUPPA2 or DRIM-Seq, expressed as proportion of the total DTU identifications reported by SUPPA2 (1252 transcripts) or DRIM-Seq (1680 genes).

Figure 5.

The colours represent the different criteria imposed by RATs. Since no abundance pre-filtering was enabled for any of the tools, there are no rejections caused by the transcript abundance and the effective number of expressed isoforms. DTU: Differential transcript usage.