Table 1. comparison of the results by Deng et al. (2013, 31) against the results of RATs, SUPPA2 and DRIM-Seq, using the same data and annotation (Ensembl v60).
The first column shows the fraction of the 248 genes that was recaptured by each method. For methods reporting at the transcript level, results were aggregated to the respective genes. The last three columns show whether the verdicts for each of the validated genes (DTU Yes/No). DTU: Differential transcript usage.
| Deng
et al.
(2013) 31 |
TOM1L1 | CMTM4 | PEX11B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RATs (genes) | 0.11 | N | Y | N |
| RATs (tr. aggreg.) | 0.11 | N | Y | N |
| SUPPA2 (tr. aggreg.) | 0.17 | Y | Y | Y |
| DRIM-Seq | 0.26 | N | Y | N |