Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD007402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007402.pub3

Aoki 1984.

Methods R, DB, PC, AC, parallel groups
Gel applied to affected area 3 or 4 times daily, with no occlusion for 7 days
Assessment at baseline, 3, 7 days
Participants Acute orthopaedic trauma (contusion, distortion, fracture, < 7 days)
N = 252 (203 analysed for efficacy)
M 98, F 105
Age range 8 to 86 years, 13% younger than 20 years
Baseline pain mild in 35%
Exclusions: 23 protocol violations, 26 reasons "not related" to drug. Equally distributed between groups
Interventions Piroxicam gel 0.5%, 1 g 3 to 4 x daily, n = 84
Indomethacin gel 1%, 1 g 3 to 4 x daily, n = 84
Placebo gel, n = 84
No other medication or initiation of physical therapy allowed
Outcomes PGE: 5‐point scale (responder = "better" and "much better")
Adverse events
Withdrawals and exclusions
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1. Total = 4/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "key code sealed until end of study"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Gels in "identical tubes"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk > 10% withdrawals "unrelated to treatment" and for "protocol violations". No further details, but no significant differences between groups
Size Unclear risk 50 to 200 participants per treatment group