Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 14;10:282. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00282

Table 4.

Effect of different concentrations of H2O2 at various immersion times on in vitro sterilization of chrysanthemum.

Treatments Contamination frequency (%) Explant viability (%)
H2O2 (%)
0 100.00 ± 00.00 00.00 ± 00.00
10.5 60.74 ± 2.82 37.78 ± 2.48
11 47.41 ± 2.34 49.63 ± 3.35
11.5 33.33 ± 4.30 62.22 ± 4.01
12 8.15 ± 2.43 90.37 ± 2.51
Time (min)
5 56.44 ± 7.50 41.33 ± 7.28
10 50.67 ± 8.26 47.11 ± 8.06
15 42.67 ± 9.02 55.56 ± 8.80
H2O2 (%) ×Time (min)
0 × 5 100.00 ± 00.00 00.00 ± 00.00
0 × 10 100.00 ± 00.00 00.00 ± 00.00
0 × 15 100.00 ± 00.00 00.00 ± 00.00
10.5 × 5 68.89 ± 2.22 31.11 ± 2.22
10.5 × 10 62.22 ± 2.22 35.56 ± 2.22
10.5 × 15 51.11 ± 2.22 46.67 ± 0.00
11 × 5 53.33 ± 3.85 42.22 ± 5.88
11 × 10 46.67 ± 3.85 48.89 ± 5.88
11 × 15 42.22 ± 2.22 57.78 ± 2.22
11.5 × 5 44.44 ± 2.22 51.11 ± 4.45
11.5 × 10 37.78 ± 2.22 60.00 ± 00.00
11.5 × 15 17.78 ± 4.45 75.56 ± 4.45
12 × 5 15.56 ± 2.22 82.22 ± 2.22
12 × 10 6.67 ± 3.85 91.11 ± 2.22
12 × 15 2.22 ± 2.22 97.78 ± 2.22

Values in each column represent means ±SE.