Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 4;56(1):7–12. doi: 10.29399/npa.21632

Table 3.

Comparison of two group in terms of intensity of anger expression

SequenceSch>C(N=9) SequenceSch=C(N=11)
NFU [median, (min-max)] 5, (4–9) 5, (4–7) Z=-0.04, P=0.97
IntTotal [median, (min-max)] 9, (4–19) 17 (7–23) Z=-2.39, P=0.017*
Intlip [median, (min-max)] 2, (1–10) 6.5, (2–10) Z=-1.76, P=0.080
Inteye [median, (min-max)] 2, (1–8) 5.5, (2–9) Z=-2.07, P=0.038*
Intother [median, (min-max)] 2, (0–6) 4, (0–9) Z=-0.89, P=0.371
AL [median, (min-max)] 63, (16–114) 80, (49–138) Z=-2.03, P=0.043*

NFU, Number of Functional Unit; Int, Intensitiy of units; AL, Anger load;

*

statistically significant; SequenceSch>C, sequences perceived as more threatening by schizophrenia patients; SequenceSch=C, sequences perceived as equally threatening in the two groups.