Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;16(5):717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050717

Table 4.

Sensitivity analyses of talc exposure on the risk of stomach cancer.

Model Person-Years (Cases) Adjusted Hazard Ratio
HR (95% CI) p-Value
Original model
 Cumulative talc exposure
  Low to none (≤ 6g) 9,774,552 (1816) 1.00
  Medium (6~21g) 87,550 (23) 2.30 (1.48–3.57) <0.001
  High (>21g) 47,004 (10) 1.58 (0.79–3.17) 0.19
Changing the cut-off points
for levels of talc exposure a
 Cumulative talc exposure
  Unexposed 9,728,639 (1804) 1.00
  Low (≤10.5 g) 88,312 (23) 2.40 (1.54–3.73) 0.007
  High (>10.5 g) 92,155 (22) 1.89 (1.19–3.01) <0.001
Excluding time to event
less than five years b
 Cumulative talc exposure
  Low to none (≤6 g) 9,755,288 (1671) 1.00
  Medium (6–21 g) 78,828 (6) 0.86 (0.39–1.93) 0.72
  High (>21 g) 43,288 (7) 1.99 (0.81–3.59) 0.16

The adjusted hazard ratio was adjusted by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) excluding malignancies. Bold numbers: significant results. a The cut-off point for distinguishing levels of talc exposure was changed into the median of cumulative exposure in subjects received talc prescription. b The time to event (stomach cancer, drop-out, or follow-up endpoint) less than five years was excluded to ensure the 5-year minimal induction period of talc to stomach cancer.