Table A3.

Enhancement motives regressed on neighborhood and individual measures (95% credible intervals) n = 1045 (Intermediate Data Zones n = 188).

Predictor Variable	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Sex (male)	0.01 (−0.05, 0.07)	0.01 (−0.05, 0.07)	0.01 (−0.05, 0.07)
Family Structure (Ref: both parents)
single parent	0.11 (0.03, 0.20) **	0.10 (0.02, 0.18) *	0.10 (0.01, 0.18) *
step family/other	0.08 (−0.01, 0.17)	0.07 (−0.02, 0.16)	0.07 (−0.02, 0.17)
Family Affluence (Ref: low)
medium	−0.00 (−0.08, 0.08)	0.02 (−0.06, 0.09)	0.02 (−0.06, 0.10)
high	0.02 (−0.06, 0.09)	0.04 (−0.03, 0.12)	0.04 (−0.04, 0.11)
On-trade license density		−0.00 (−0.01, 0.01)	−0.00 (−0.01, 0.01)
Off-trade license density		0.03 (−0.00, 0.06)	0.02 (−0.00, 0.05)
Urban/rurality (Ref: Large cities)
other urban		−0.03 (−0.15, 0.08)	−0.03 (−0.15, 0.09)
accessible small towns		0.06 (−0.07, 0.19)	0.06 (−0.07, 0.19)
accessible rural		0.03 (−0.10, 0.15)	0.03 (−0.10, 0.15)
remote small towns		−0.05 (−0.18, 0.08)	−0.05 (−0.17, 0.08)
remote rural		0.04 (−0.09, 0.16)	0.03 (−0.09, 0.16)
Neighborhood deprivation (Ref: 1 most deprived)
2		−0.07 (−0.17, 0.03)	−0.07 (−0.17, 0.03)
3		−0.05 (−0.15, 0.05)	−0.05 (−0.14, 0.05)
4 least deprived		−0.05 (−0.15, 0.06)	−0.04 (−0.15, 0.06)
neighborhood-level social cohesion		0.04 (−0.13, 0.21)	0.04 (−0.14, 0.22)
neighborhood-level disorder		0.24 (−0.04, 0.50) †	0.10 (−0.19, 0.40)
Perceived social cohesion			−0.00 (−0.01, 0.01)
Perceived disorder			0.03 (0.00, 0.05) *
Neighborhood variance	0.005 (0.000, 0.014)	0.005 (0.001, 0.015)	0.005 (0.001, 0.014)
Individual variance	0.237 (0.217, 0.259)	0.236 (0.215, 0.259)	0.236 (0.215, 0.257)
Bayesian DIC	1486.32	1491.99	1491.21
Residual Moran’s I			0.0393 (p = 0.166)

Burn-in 5,000 chain length 200,000; DIC = Deviance Information Criteria; * $p<0.05$, ** $p<0.01$, *** $p<0.001$; enhancement motives are log-transformed.