Table A4.
Predictor Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Sex (male) | 0.05 (0.00, 0.10) * | 0.05 (0.00, 0.10) * | 0.05 (0.01, 0.10) * |
Family Structure (Ref: both parents) | |||
single parent | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.03) | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.03) | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.03) |
step family/other | 0.02 (−0.05, 0.09) | 0.02 (−0.05, 0.10) | 0.02 (−0.05, 0.10) |
Family Affluence (Ref: low) | |||
medium | −0.01 (−0.07, 0.05) | −0.00 | |
(−0.07, 0.06) | −0.01 (−0.07, 0.06) | ||
high | −0.01 (−0.07, 0.05) | −0.00 | |
(−0.06, 0.06) | −0.01 (−0.07, 0.06) | ||
On-trade license density | −0.00 | ||
(−0.01, 0.01) | −0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) | ||
Off-trade license density | 0.01 | ||
(−0.02, 0.03) | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.03) | ||
Urban/rurality (Ref: Large cities) | |||
other urban | 0.02 | ||
(−0.07, 0.12) | 0.02 (−0.07, 0.11) | ||
accessible small towns | 0.03 | ||
(−0.07, 0.14) | 0.03 (−0.07, 0.14) | ||
accessible rural | 0.07 (−0.03, 0.17) | 0.07 (−0.03, 0.17) | |
remote small towns | 0.03 (−0.07, 0.13) | 0.03 (−0.07, 0.13) | |
remote rural | 0.04 (−0.05, 0.14) | 0.04 (−0.06, 0.14) | |
Neighborhood deprivation (Ref: 1 most deprived) | |||
2 | −0.10 (−0.18, −0.03) * | −0.10 (−0.18, −0.02) * | |
3 | −0.05 (−0.12, 0.03) | −0.04 (−0.12, 0.04) | |
4 least deprived | −0.07 (−0.15, 0.01) | −0.07 (−0.15, 0.02) | |
neighborhood-level social cohesion | 0.04 (−0.09, 0.17) | 0.01 (−0.13, 0.16) | |
neighborhood-level disorder | 0.02 (−0.19, 0.24) | −0.03 (−0.27, 0.21) | |
Perceived social cohesion | 0.00 (−0.01, 0.02) | ||
Perceived disorder | 0.01 (−0.01, 0.03) | ||
Neighborhood variance | 0.002 (0.000, 0.006) | 0.002 (0.000, 0.007) | 0.002 (0.000, 0.007) |
Individual variance | 0.154 (0.141, 0.168) | 0.154 (0.141, 0.168) | 0.154 (0.141, 0.168) |
Bayesian DIC | 1029.99 | 1043.24 | 1045.74 |
Residual Moran’s I | 0.003 (p = 0.792) |
Burn-in 5000 chain length 200,000; DIC = Deviance Information Criteria; * , ** , *** ; conformity motives are log-transformed.