Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;19(5):1169. doi: 10.3390/s19051169

Table 1.

Assessment of the individual energy-harvesting capability of NOMA and BEEM-NOMA. SIC, successive interference cancellation.

System Evaluation Receiver U1 U2 U3 U4
Decode NOMA U1, U2, U3 and U4 U2, U3 and U4 U3 and U4 U4
M-NOMA U1 and U2 U2 U3 and U4 U4
SIC NOMA U2, U3, and U4 U3 and U4 U4 N/A
M-NOMA U2 N/A U4 N/A
Interference cancellation NOMA No No No With U1, U2, and U3
M-NOMA No No No With U3 only
Energy-harvested signals NOMA Power splitting of U1’s, U2’s, U3’s, and U4’s signals Power splitting of U1’s, U2’s, U3’s, and U4’s signals Power splitting of U1’s, U2’s, U3’s, and U4’s signals Power splitting of U1’s, U2’s, U3’s, and U4’s signals
M-NOMA Power splinting of U1’s and U2’s signals and directly without power splitting from U3’s and U4’s signals Power splitting of U1’s and U2’s signals and directly without power splitting from U3’s and U4’s signals Power splitting of U3’s and U4’s signals and directly without power splitting from U1’s and U2’s signals Power splitting of U3’s and U4’s signals and directly without power splitting from U1’s and U2’s signals