Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;16(5):710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050710

Table 1.

Articles that describe oral health barriers African American families encounter.

Reference Purpose Population Study Design Key Findings Category
Behrens et al. [16] To explore factors and identify strategies that could improve the oral health of low income and minority children 25 state and federal policy makers, workforce experts, foundation officials, educators, researchers with interest in children’s oral health Qualitative Study; interviews with stakeholder and policy makers Policy stakeholders believe that improving oral health for children requires addressing: both consumer demand and provider supply, lack of outcry for accessible oral health, undervaluing oral health, health literacy and outreach campaigns Structural
Bhagavatula et al. [17] To document the rates of prevention, restoration, and surgical dental procedures provided to children enrolled in private insurance, Delta Dental 266,380 children (age 0–18) (12% African American), that received care from 2002–2008 in Milwaukee Descriptive study; registry summary design 44% of AA had one dental visit during study period; rates of preventative procedures increased to age 9 and then decreased Structural
Collins et al. [18] To understand what parents consider to be important factors and resources that influence their child’s oral care Utilized Photovoice with 10 parents of infants and toddlers; five group sessions were conducted Qualitative Study; participatory research approach Poor oral health was associated with avoidance of problems; financial constraints, time constraints, and occasional parental frustration completing child’s oral hygiene routines Familial, Sociocultural, Structural
Dawkins et al. [19] To compare sociodemographic differences between caries and no caries groups and investigate factors associated with untreated dental caries 2453 participants (5.8% African American), children (age 6–15), school-based dental sealant program in KY Observational Study; pooled cross-sectional design Older children living in rural areas were more likely to have untreated dental caries and lack insurance Structural
Dodd et al. [20] To explore oral health perceptions and dental care behaviors among rural adolescents 100 rural youth (age 12–18), (80% Black), low SES Qualitative study; emergent thematic approach Perceived threat from oral disease was low, esthetics main reason for seeking care; access, finances, transportation, and fear were also noted Sociocultural
Eisen et al. [21] Examine relationship between race and dental services 1408 participants (59.3% African American) Observational Study; cross-sectional analysis of data from The Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities (Baltimore, MD) More AA used dental services in previous 2 years; place of living an important factor to consider when seeking to understand race difference in dental service use Structural
Fisher-Owens et al. [22] To assess the extent that factors other than race explain disparities in children’s oral health Data from National Survey of Children’s Health Children (n = 82,020) (age 2–17) Observational Study; model based survey data analysis AA more likely to report poor oral health, lack preventative care, and experience unmet need. However, these are attenuated, to varying degrees, when researchers adjust for socioeconomic status Structural
Flores et al. [23] To identify racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and uses of services in U.S. children Sample from National Surveys of Children’s Health, parents of 90,117 children (age 0–17), (9.84% African American) Descriptive study; secondary analysis Disparities continue to exist, with increased use of services disparities decreased; however, several new disparities for African American children including uninsurance rates and difficulty getting specialty care Structural
Flores et al. [24] To examine parental awareness of and the reasons for lack of insurance coverage in eligible communities 97 recruitment sites; 267 participants (age 0–18) (35% African American) Observational Study; cross-sectional design Half the participants were unaware that their children were eligible for federally funded insurance Structural
Guarnizo-Herreño et al. [25] To measure inequalities in children’s dental health based on racial/ethnic identity Representative sample of children and adolescents (age 2–11); White, Black, Hispanic Observational Study; decomposition model for analysis SES accounted for 71% of the gap in preventive dental care between AA and White Structural
Isong et al. [26] To examine the impact of national health policies on AA children’s receipt of dental care Children 2–17 years old; from 1964 to 2010 Observational study Percent of AA children without a dental visit declined significantly over time Sociocultural, Structural
Lau et al. [27] To examine racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health status, access to care and use of services in U.S. adolescents 47,728 parent responses from National Surveys of Children’s Health for adolescents (age 10–17), (9.84% African American) Descriptive study; secondary analysis Suboptimal health and lack of personal doctor were found to be one of the most profound disparities to exist Structural
Pourat et al. [28] To look at racial and ethnic differences between children with private insurance and those in Medicaid or CHIP Sample from the California Survey of Health, 10,805 children (age 0–11) (7% African American) Descriptive study AA with Medicare more likely to have longer intervals between visits than Caucasian children with Medicare Structural

Note. AA = African American; SES = socioeconomic status; CHIP = Children’s Health Insurance Program.