Relative effects of location relative to the corpus luteum and lactation on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium

Yann Locatelli; Niamh Forde; Helmut Blum; Alexander Graf; Benoît Piégu; Pascal Mermillod; Eckhard Wolf; Patrick Lonergan; Marie Saint-Dizier

doi:10.1186/s12864-019-5616-2

. 2019 Mar 21;20:233. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5616-2

Relative effects of location relative to the corpus luteum and lactation on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium

Yann Locatelli ^1,⁵, Niamh Forde ², Helmut Blum ³, Alexander Graf ³, Benoît Piégu ¹, Pascal Mermillod ¹, Eckhard Wolf ³, Patrick Lonergan ⁴, Marie Saint-Dizier ^1,^6,^✉

PMCID: PMC6427878 PMID: 30898106

Abstract

Background

Lactation and associated metabolic stresses during the post-partum period have been shown to impair fertility in dairy cows. The oviduct plays key roles in embryo development and the establishment of pregnancy in cattle. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lactation and location relative to the corpus luteum (CL) on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium.

Results

An original animal model was used. At 60 days post-partum, Holstein lactating (n = 4) and non-lactating (i.e. never milked after calving; n = 5) cows, as well as control nulliparous heifers (n = 5), were slaughtered on Day 3 following induced estrus, and epithelial samples from the oviductal ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral and contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) were recovered for RNA sequencing. In the oviduct ipsilateral to the CL, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between heifers compared with both postpartum cow groups. However, only 15 DEGs were identified between post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows in the ipsilateral isthmus and none were identified in the ipsilateral ampulla. In contrast, 192 and 2583 DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral ampulla and isthmus, respectively. In both regions, more DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts in non-lactating cows and heifers than in lactating cows. Functional annotation of the DEGs associated with comparisons between metabolic groups highlighted a number of over-represented biological functions and cell pathways including immune response and cholesterol/steroid biosynthesis.

Conclusions

Gene expression in the oviduct epithelium, particularly in the isthmus, was more affected by the location relative to the CL than by lactation at Day 3 post-estrus. Furthermore, the effect of the proximity to the CL was modulated by the metabolic status of the cow.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5616-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Oviduct, Lactation, RNAseq, Dairy cow, Metabolism

Background

The physiological changes associated with high milk production are related to poor reproductive efficiency in commercial dairy herds [1, 2]. Decreasing (glucose, insulin-like growth factor 1) or increasing (non-esterified fatty acids, NEFA, ketone bodies) circulating metabolites during nutrient partitioning associated with low body condition score (BCS) undoubtedly play a role in determining reproductive outcome. However, the causes of infertility in dairy cattle are complex and may be attributable to compromised oocyte quality and/or a suboptimal reproductive tract environment incapable of supporting normal embryo/conceptus development or a combination of both.

Fertilization and the first 4–5 days of embryo development occur in the oviduct, which provides a unique environment in terms of metabolites, proteins, steroid hormones and ions, as compared with the uterine lumen [3–7]. The oviduct clearly plays a role in providing an appropriate environment conducive to normal embryo development and establishment of pregnancy. Data from nonsurgical flushing of single-ovulating dairy cows indicate that about 50% of embryos degenerate by Day 7 after breeding, i.e. before or just after leaving the oviduct [8, 9]. We have reported that embryo development to Day 7 following endoscopic transfer to the oviducts of postpartum lactating cows was compromised in comparison to that in the tract of nulliparous heifers [10], consistent with the previously reviewed data. More recently, age-matched postpartum primiparous dairy cows that were either milked post calving (i.e. post-partum lactating) or were dried off immediately at calving (i.e., post-partum non-lactating) were used to directly test the effects of lactation on postpartum fertility characteristics [11]. Consistent with the results of Rizos et al. [10], transfer of embryos to the oviducts of lactating cows resulted in lower blastocyst development than that observed in post-partum non-lactating cows or heifers [11], suggesting an impaired oviduct environment due to the metabolic stress associated with lactation. The endometrial transcriptome was reported to be affected by lactation on Day 17 in cyclic and pregnant Holstein cows [12] and on Day 19 in pregnant Holstein cows [13]. However, data on the effects of lactation on the oviductal environment are currently lacking.

In addition to systemic changes induced by lactation [14], normal changes in the oviductal environment in response to the formation and function of the corpus luteum (CL) may possibly be perturbed by the high energy demands associated with lactation. The concentrations of several steroid hormones in bovine oviductal tissue and oviductal fluid were reported to be higher in the ipsilateral than the contralateral side relative to ovulation [7, 15]. Moreover, transcriptomic differences between the oviduct epithelial cells ipsilateral and contralateral to the early CL have been reported [16]. However, the possible interaction between the metabolic status of the cow and the regulatory role of the proximal CL is currently not known.

In this study, we hypothesized that part of the difference in fertility between heifers or post-partum non-lactating and lactating dairy cows could be explained by differences in the transcriptome of the oviduct epithelium, associated with a compromised ability to support early embryo development. The animals used in this study were part of a large cohort previously characterized for their metabolic status [14] and included age-matched post-partum primiparous lactating or non-lactating dairy cows, and a contemporaneous group of nulliparous non-pregnant heifers. A subset of females in each group was previously used to study the effect of lactation on metabolomic profiles in the follicular fluid [14] and uterine fluid [17], as well as on gene expression in the conceptus [17] and endometrium [13] on Day 19 of pregnancy. In the current study, in an independent subset of non-inseminated animals from each of the three groups, we collected oviduct tissues on Day 3 of a synchronized estrous cycle on which we carried out RNA sequencing in order to better understand the factors contributing to reduced early embryo survival in lactating cows.

Results

The different groups of animals and tissues used in the RNAseq analyses are summarized in Fig. 1a.

Plasma progesterone levels according to the metabolic status

No differences were observed in plasma concentrations of progesterone on Day 3 of the estrous cycle between heifers, post-partum non-lactating and lactating cows (Fig. 1b).

Effect of lactation on the transcriptome of the oviduct epithelium in the ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral to the corpus luteum

The effect of the metabolic status on the oviduct epithelial transcriptome was assessed in the ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral to the CL, where fertilization and early embryo development takes place in vivo.

In the ampulla

The comparison of post-partum lactating vs. non-lactating cows and heifers vs. post-partum non-lactating cows revealed no differentially expressed genes (DEG) in the ampulla. In this region, 19 genes were differentially expressed between heifers and lactating cows (Fig. 2a; see the lists of all DEGs between metabolic groups in Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 2 — Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in pairwise comparisons between heifers (H) and post-partum lactating (L) and non-lactating (NL) cows in the ampulla (left diagram, a) and isthmus (right diagram, b) ipsilateral to the corpus luteum on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. The histograms below show the total number of DEGs in each group

In the isthmus

In the isthmus, only 15 DEGs were identified between post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows. However, 127 DEGs were identified between heifers and post-partum lactating cows and 223 DEGs between heifers and post-partum non-lactating cows. The overlap in DEGs between heifers vs. lactating and heifers vs. non-lactating comparisons was low as only 22 DEGs were shared between the two lists (Fig. 2b and Additional file 1: Table S1).

Lists of the most differentially expressed genes between metabolic groups in the isthmus and their regulation (up or down) are presented in Fig. 3. Among those, GAT (coding for glycine N-acyltransferase) was down-regulated in both post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows compared to heifers, while BLA-DQB (major histocompatibility complex class II antigen) was up-regulated in lactating cows compared with both non-lactating cows and heifers. In addition, FAT4 (FAT atypical cadherin 4) was down-regulated in non-lactating cows compared with both heifers and lactating cows (Fig. 3).

Analysis of the gene ontology (GO) terms associated with the DEGs between heifers and lactating cows indicated several Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Biological Process (BP) involved in steroid metabolism. GO terms such as ‘steroid biosynthesis’, ‘steroid metabolic process’ and ‘cholesterol biosynthetic process’ were associated with up-regulated genes in heifers (Fig. 4). The BP ‘pyruvate metabolic process’ was also identified with five associated genes (3 upregulated in heifers and 2 upregulated in lactating). Analysis of the GO terms associated with the DEGs between heifers and non-lactating cows indicated the ‘humoral immune response’ BP associated with up-regulated DEGs in non-lactating cows (Fig. 4; Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 4 — Schematic representation of Biological Process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways/compounds associated with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in pairwise comparison between heifers, lactating and non-lactating cows in the isthmus ipsilateral to the corpus luteum on Day 3 of the estrous cycle (Cytoscape Cluego analysis). Terms in red includes up-regulated DEGs in heifers compared with lactating (left) or non-lactating (right) cows. Terms in green includes up-regulated DEGs in lactating (left) or non-lactating (right) compared with heifers

Effect of location relative to the corpus luteum on the transcriptome of oviduct epithelium in the ampulla and isthmus

Overall, gene expression in both the ampulla and isthmus was more affected by the location relative to the CL than by lactation. Irrespective of the metabolic status, the number of DEGs between ipsilateral and contralateral cells was higher in the isthmus than in the ampulla (2583 vs. 192 DEGs, Fig. 5). Furthermore, in both regions, the lowest number of DEGs was identified in lactating cows compared with heifers and non-lactating cows (i.e. the highest number of DEG was identified by comparing heifers with non-lactating cows).

Fig. 5 — Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified between ipsilateral and contralateral ampullas (left diagram, a) and isthmus (right diagram, b) in heifers (H), post-partum lactating (L) and non-lactating (NL) cows on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. The histograms below show the total number of DEGs in each group

In the ampulla

Overall, 192 DEGs were identified between the ipsilateral and contralateral ampullas, most of which were in the non-lactating group (139 DEGs of which 124 were specific to this group; see Additional file 2: Table S2 for all DEGs between the ipsilateral and contralateral ampullas). Furthermore, a low proportion (7.8%) of those DEGs was shared between metabolic groups (11 genes shared between heifers and non-lactating; two between non-lactating and lactating; none between lactating and heifers and two shared by the three groups; Fig. 5a). Of the 192 DEGs identified, 73 were up- and 119 were down-regulated in the ipsilateral ampulla compared to the contralateral side, with relatively low fold changes (91% of the 192 DEGs with a fold change < 2). The top 20 up- and down- DEGs in each metabolic group are presented in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6 — Total number and top-20 (according to fold change) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified between ipsilateral and contralateral ampullas in heifers, non-lactating and lactating cows on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. DEGs upregulated in the ampulla ipsilateral to the corpus luteum (CL) (or downregulated in the contralateral side) are listed on the left. DEGs upregulated in the ampulla contralateral to the CL (or downregulated in the ipsilateral side) are listed on the right. Genes in red and blur are shared by the three metabolic groups, and heifers and non-lactating cows, respectively

Given the low number of DEGs in the lactating group, GO analyses were performed only in the two other groups. Detailed lists of BP associated with up- and down-regulated genes in the ampulla are provided in Additional file 2: Table S2. In the non-lactating group, four KEGG pathways such as ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ or ‘Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation’ involving up-regulated genes in the ipsilateral ampulla were identified. Among BP identified, ‘steroid metabolic process’ and ‘cholesterol homeostasis’ were associated to up -regulated genes in ipsilateral ampulla. In the ampulla from heifers, only the ‘Cholesterol metabolism’ KEGG pathway was identified, associated with ABCA1 and APOE which were down-regulated in the ipsilateral side.

In the isthmus

A total of 2583 DEGs were identified when comparing the ipsilateral and contralateral isthmus, with a low to moderate overlap between groups of animals (502 DEGs shared between heifers and non-lactating cows; 74 between heifers and lactating cows; 32 between non-lactating and lactating cows; 171 shared by the three groups; see Fig. 5b and Additional file 3: Table S3). The heifers group was the most affected by the proximity of the CL (1927 DEGs), followed by the post-partum non-lactating (1275) and lactating (331) groups. Overall, 1162 genes were up-regulated and 1421 down-regulated in the ipsilateral isthmus, with a higher degree of differential expression than in the ampulla (max fold changes of 3.9 for up-regulated genes and 6.1 for down-regulated genes; see top-20 up and down DEGs for the isthmus in Fig. 7 and Additional file 3: Table S3).

Fig. 7 — Total number and top-20 (according to fold changes) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified between ipsilateral and contralateral isthmus in heifers, non-lactating and lactating cows on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. DEGs upregulated in the isthmus ipsilateral to the corpus luteum CL (or downregulated in the contralateral side) are listed on the left. DEGs upregulated in the isthmus contralateral to the CL (or downregulated in the ipsilateral side) are listed on the right. Genes in red, blue, green and purple are shared by the three metabolic groups, heifers and non-lactating cows, heifers and lactating cows, and non-lactating and lactating cows, respectively

A high number of BP and KEGG pathways were identified for each metabolic group. Most of these GO terms included genes specifically up-regulated in the ipsilateral isthmus (Additional file 3: Table S3). Lastly, when considering the 171 DEGs shared between the three metabolic groups (of which 115 were up-regulated in the ipsilateral and 56 up-regulated in the contralateral isthmus), six KEGG pathways were identified, including ‘Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism’, ‘PPAR signalling pathway’, ‘HIF-1 signaling pathway’, ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’, ‘Glutathione metabolism’ and ‘Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis’ (Fig. 8 and Additional file 3: Table S3).

Fig. 8 — Schematic representation of Biological Process and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways/compounds associated with DEGs shared by heifers, post-partum non-lactating and lactating cows when comparing ipsilateral and contralateral isthmus at Day 3 of the estrous cycle (Cytoscape ClueGO analysis). Networks including genes up-regulated in ipsilateral isthmus are in red while networks including genes up-regulated in contralateral isthmus (or down-regulated in ipsilateral isthmus) are represented in green

Discussion

By comparing post-partum non-lactating and lactating Holstein cows, this study addressed the effect of lactation on gene expression in the oviduct. The main findings were that on Day 3 of the estrous cycle when, in pregnant animals the embryo would be at the 8-cell stage and undergoing embryonic genome activation, 1) gene expression in the oviduct was more affected by the location relative to the CL than by lactation, irrespective of the oviduct region; 2) the isthmus, where the embryo would be located at this stage in pregnant animals, was more affected by the metabolic status of the cow and the location relative to the CL than the ampulla; 3) a higher number of DEGs according to the proximity of the CL were identified in heifers and non-lactating cows than in lactating cows, suggesting an interaction between lactation and the regulatory role of the proximal CL on gene expression in oviduct epithelium.

Effect of metabolism on oviduct epithelial gene expression

Results from recent studies in which bovine embryos were transferred into the oviduct of animals of different metabolic status indicate that the oviductal environment is compromised by lactation [10, 11]. In the present study, the direct comparison between oviduct epithelial cells from post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows on Day 3 of the estrous cycle identified only 15 DEGs in the isthmus and none in the ampulla. This may be related to the variability in gene expression profiles observed within groups. Nonetheless, the results suggest that lactation does not dramatically affect the transcriptome of the oviduct at this stage. Similarly, RNA-sequencing performed on the endometrium from lactating and non-lactating cows on Day 19 of pregnancy failed to demonstrate a major effect of lactation on uterine gene expression; the number of DEGs identified between lactating and non-lactating cows was much lower than that identified between heifers and both groups of cows [13]. However, we cannot exclude a modification by lactation of the composition of the oviductal fluid, in which the early embryo develops. Several amino acids were reported to be differentially abundant in the uterine luminal fluid ipsilateral to the CL recovered from heifers compared with lactating and non-lactating cows on Day 19 of pregnancy [17]. Oviductal fluid is a complex and dynamic fluid resulting from the ultrafiltration of the circulating blood, de novo synthesis from oviduct epithelial cells and potential input from the preovulatory follicle. The negative energy balance associated with lactation in the post-partum period is well established in dairy cattle [2]. Up to 60 days post-partum, at which time the oviducts were collected in the current study, important modifications in plasma and intra-follicular concentrations of numerous metabolites and hormones, that could contribute to the alteration of the oviductal environment, were reported between non-lactating and lactating cows [11, 14, 18].

Investigation of the effect of metabolism on the oviduct transcriptome allowed to the identification of DEGs and associated signalling pathways in the ipsilateral oviduct. Overall, the enrichment of GO functions observed in comparisons between metabolic groups may underline some interesting differences in tissue physiology. Genes such as FAT4 (FAT atypical cadherin 4), SPP1 (osteopontin), PGM5 (phosphoglucomutase 5), STEAP4 (STEAP4 metalloreductase), MYLK3 (myosin light chain kinase 3) and TGFA (transforming growth factor alpha) that were regulated in the isthmus of lactating cows compared to non-lactating counterparts could represent interesting candidates. The up-regulation of SPP1 in the isthmus of lactating cows was, however, unexpected. Indeed, the addition of SPP1-derived protein, osteopontin, to culture medium was shown to improve in vitro fertilization and embryo development in the porcine and bovine species [19, 20].

When comparing heifers with lactating cows, the expression of genes involved in the metabolism of pyruvate and glucose, two metabolites essential for embryo development, was also affected in the ipsilateral isthmus. PDK4 and PRKAG3 were found up-regulated in lactating cows whereas HK1, OGDH and ME3 were found up-regulated in heifers. This may reflect some possible consequences of the negative energy balance associated with lactation on oviduct metabolism. PDK4 (pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4) plays a key role in the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex by switching from glucose to fatty acid degradation. HK1 (hexokinase 1) phosphorylates glucose to produce glucose-6-phosphate, the first step in most glucose metabolism pathways. OGDH (oxoglutarate dehydrogenase) encodes a subunit that catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of alpha-ketoglutarate to succinyl-CoA. ME3 (NADP-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial) plays a pivotal role in allowing malate oxidative decarboxylation to pyruvate. Taken together, these data suggest different orientation in oviduct tissue metabolism according to the metabolic status of the animal itself. Differences in pyruvate metabolism pathway in oviductal cells may in turn affect concentrations of metabolites in the oviductal fluid. This is of particular interest for the early embryo which switches from an oxidative metabolism (using pyruvate and lactate as the main sources of energy) to a glycolytic metabolism during its travel through the oviduct [21].

Numerous genes involved in cholesterol metabolism and steroid biosynthesis were also identified as differentially expressed between heifers and lactating cows in the ipsilateral isthmus, as well as in the ipsilateral ampulla. Recently, cholesterol biosynthesis was identified as a key pathway altered with modification of estrogen/progesterone environment in the bovine oviduct [22]. Taken together, these data suggest that heifers and lactating cows may either differ in their steroid secretion at the ovarian level or in steroid diffusion to oviduct. While ovarian steroids are well known to regulate numerous functions in the oviduct, few studies examined the ability of oviductal cells to synthesize steroid hormones. In equines, oviductal explants were able to produce high amounts of progesterone in vitro and the expression of several steroidogenic enzymes were evidenced in oviductal cells, suggesting oviduct steroidogenic capacities [23, 24]. Further research is needed to examine if the bovine oviduct is able to metabolize cholesterol/steroids and whether this ability differs between heifers and lactating cows.

Gene expression analysis in the ipsilateral isthmus from heifers compared to non-lactating cows allowed the identification of a different set of DEGs and associated BP. Interestingly, BP such as ‘humoral immune response’ (including BPIFA1, C1S, C3, CXCL10 and SERPING1 genes) and ‘complement activation’ (C1S, C3 and SERPING1) were found up-regulated in the isthmus of non-lactating cows, suggesting potential differences in the modulation of the maternal immune system between the two groups. In the mouse and human, complement C3 has been shown to be expressed in the oviduct epithelium [25, 26]. During early pregnancy, the oviduct and the early embryo collaborate to convert C3 into its derivative iC3b, which has an embryotrophic effect [26, 27]. The expression of C1S and SERPING1 has been documented in the endometrium of Day 18 pregnant cows and the simultaneous upregulation of SERPING1, encoding a protein known as C1 inhibitor, has been proposed as a mechanism to modulate the maternal immune system and protect the embryo from the complement [28]. Whether these differences in gene expression could be involved in differences in embryo survival between heifers and cows previously observed by others [10, 11] remains to be determined.

Effect of the location relative to the CL on oviduct gene expression

Differences in gene expression were identified between epithelial cells derived from ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts in heifers, lactating and non-lactating cows. These differences may reflect effects of the developing CL on the proximal oviduct. Ipsilateral and contraletaral oviducts were reported to differ in their number of mucosal folds [29], hormonal content [7, 15], protein content [6] and gene expression [16, 29] in the post-ovulatory period in cows. Similar to the latter studies, our experimental model cannot differentiate the potential effects of the presence of a non-fertilized oocyte and its surrounding cumulus cells on the ipsilateral oviduct. Indeed, the presence of gametes (spermatozoa) or developing embryos after multiple embryo transfer has been reported to modify the oviductal transcriptome in vivo [30, 31]. However, one of these studies [31] was in pigs, a litter-bearing species, while in the other, the presence of a single embryo and spermatozoa after artificial insemination did not have any effect on the oviduct transcriptome on Day 3 after estrus in heifers [30]. In our study, samples were collected 3 days after estrus, i.e. around 2 days after ovulation; based results from [30], it is unlikely that a single unfertilized oocyte would have detectable effects on the oviductal transcriptome.

A total number of 2775 DEGs were detected between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts, irrespective of the oviduct segment and metabolic group. This effect of the side of ovulation on oviductal gene expression is in agreement with a previous transcriptomic study comparing ipsilateral and contralateral epithelial cells at Day 3.5 post-estrus in heifers [16]. Although in limited numbers, the majority of DEGs identified in the latter by suppressive subtractive hybridization (27/35) were up-regulated in the ipsilateral oviduct [16], while in the present study, numbers of up- and down-regulated DEGs in both regions of the oviduct were similar (73 up- and 119 down-regulated in the ampulla and 1162 up- and 1421 down-regulated in the isthmus).

Irrespective of the metabolic group, many more DEGs were identified according to the side of ovulation in the isthmus than in the ampulla (2583 and 192, respectively). This is in contrast to a previous study by Maillo et al. (2016), in which the proximity of the CL did not have any effect on the transcriptome of the isthmus at Day 3 post-estrus in both cyclic and pregnant heifers. In that study, microarray hybridization was used and the oviducts were collected from crossbred beef heifers [32]. The differences in the technique and breed may explain such differences in the results.

Local countercurrent transfer of ovarian steroids from the ovary to the ipsilateral oviduct has been reported in many mammals including cattle [33]. In particular, in the immediate post-ovulation period in cattle, concentrations of progesterone in the oviductal fluid [7] as well as of prostaglandins E₂ and F_2α in oviductal tissues [15] were reported to be significantly higher in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral side. Several recent studies in cattle have reported differences in oviductal gene expression related to variations in the sex steroid hormone environment or after treatment of oviduct epithelial cells with estradiol or progesterone [22, 29, 34–37]. Thus, differences in gene expression between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts may reflect the asymmetry in endocrine signals produced by the ipsilateral ovary. However, the reason why the isthmus was more affected than the ampulla by the proximity of the ovary is not clear. Data on ovarian steroid concentrations in ampulla and isthmus taken separately are currently not available. Both regions of the oviduct receive blood from tubal and uterine branches of the arterial ovary [38] and it is likely that the dynamic flow of the oviductal fluid prevents contrasted differences between the two regions. Interestingly, the gene coding for the progesterone receptor (PGR) was down-regulated in the ipsilateral compared to the contralateral isthmus in both heifers and lactating cows whereas PGR was not regulated in the ampulla. It could be speculated that at least part of the transcriptomic differences related to the side of ovulation between ampulla and isthmus at Day 3 were due to differences in progesterone responsiveness.

The regulatory role of the proximity of the CL on the oviduct transcriptome varied according to the metabolic status of the cow. Indeed, irrespective of the oviduct region, the comparison between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts revealed many more DEGs in both heifers and non-lactating cows than in lactating cows (1987 and 1414 vs. 341 DEGs, respectively), suggesting that lactation impaired or inhibited local regulatory signals emitted by the ipsilateral ovary. Previous studies using intra-oviductal transfer of embryos showed that less embryos developed to the blastocyst stage in lactating cows compared with heifers [10] and non-lactating cows [11], showing that lactation impaired the ability of the oviduct to support embryo development. Taken together, these results suggest that there may be a link between the ability of the oviduct, particularly the isthmus, to respond to local ovarian signals and the ability to sustain embryo development. How these metabolic changes may alter the local regulatory mechanisms of the ipsilateral oviduct remain however to be explored.

Conclusions

The detrimental effect of lactation on early embryo survival reported in previous studies [10, 11] could not be explained by a major alteration in the oviduct gene expression at Day 3 of the estrous cycle. However, location relative to the CL had a strong impact on oviduct gene expression, in particular in the isthmus, at this stage. The regulatory role of the CL was stronger in heifers and non-lactating cows than in lactating cows, suggesting an impairment in the ability of the ipsilateral CL to regulate oviduct gene expression in lactating cows, likely associated with the altered metabolic status.

Methods

This study was part of a larger project examining the influence of metabolic status on a variety of reproductive parameters.

Animals

The animals used in this study were part of a larger cohort. In total, 40 pregnant primiparous Holstein cows and 11 nulliparous Holstein heifers of similar estimated breeding value (EBV) were enrolled. Immediately after calving, cows were either dried off (i.e., never milked, n = 20) or milked twice daily (n = 20), as previously described [11, 14]. Depending of the question addressed, some animals were used for collection of follicular tissue and oocytes [14] and some for collection of uterine tissue and conceptuses after embryo transfer [13, 17]. For the present study, a subset of non-inseminated (i.e., cyclic) females from each group were slaughtered for oviduct collection at Day 3 after synchronized estrus. At approximately 60 days post-partum (dpp), the estrous cycles of non-lactating (n = 5) and lactating cows (n = 4), and nulliparous heifers (n = 5) were synchronized by insertion of a controlled intra-vaginal drug releasing device (CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, Sandwich, Kent, UK) containing 1.38 g of P4 for 8 days (Fig. 1). One day prior to CIDR removal, all animals received a 2-ml intramuscular (i.m.) injection of a prostaglandin F2 alpha analogue (PG: Estrumate, Intervet, Dublin, Ireland; equivalent to 0.5 mg Cloprostenol) to regress the endogenous CL. Thirty six hours after CIDR removal, each animal received a 2.5-ml i.m. injection of Receptal (Intervet, Dublin, Ireland: equivalent to 0.012 mg buserelin). On Day 3 following estrus, all animals (heifers and cows) were slaughtered at a commercial abattoir.

Sample processing

Reproductive tracts were stored on ice prior to sample collection and were processed on-site within 15 min of slaughter. Stage of cycle was confirmed by the presence of a fresh CL (corpus haemorrhagicum) on one ovary. Oviducts ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of CL were dissected between isthmus and ampulla regions. In each oviduct segment, epithelial cells were collected by gentle scraping, immediately snap frozen and stored at − 80 °C until processing.

Measurement of serum progesterone concentrations

Jugular blood samples were collected before slaughter and stored at 4 °C for 24 h, spun at 1500 g at 4 °C for 20 min and the serum supernatant decanted and stored at − 20 °C prior to analysis. Serum samples were analysed for P4 concentrations as previously described [39] using the Coat-A-Count solid phase radioimmunoassay Progesterone kit (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with an assay sensitivity of 0.03 ng/ml. The inter-assay coefficients of variation (% CV) were 10.1, 11.9 and 1.7% for the low, medium and high quality control samples and the low, medium and high intra-assay CVs were 13.4, 6.1 and 5.4%, respectively.

Transcriptomic analysis

RNA-sequencing and data analysis

Oviduct epithelial cells recovered from the ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral and contralateral to the CL were lysed with Trizol™ according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After precipitation, RNA quality and quantity was confirmed using the Agilent Bioanalyser system and all RNA samples used for RNA sequencing had an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) of 7.9 or greater. Starting from total RNA, stranded RNA sequencing libraries were constructed with the Encore Complete RNA-Seq™ library system of NuGEN. This protocol requires a minimum of 100 ng of total RNA and enriches for non-rRNA during cDNA synthesis. All libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 1500 generating between 28 and 67 million 100 bp single-end reads per library.

First the Illumina adapter sequences were removed from the 3′-end using a custom trimming script. Another tailored custom tool was used to trim poly-A tails from the 3′- and 5′-end of each read with a seed length of 6 nt. Reads with a length of below 25 nt after clipping were filtered out. Reads were mapped with Tophat2 (v.2.0.13) [40] to the bovine reference genome Btau_4.6.1 (BosTau7) with default settings based on the gene annotation (UCSC: bosTau7) from Illumina’s iGenomes Project. Transcript abundance was counted per gene using htseq-count (v.0.6.1) [41] with strand specificity (−s yes), intersection-strict mode (−m intersection-strict) and with the GFF attribute set to ‘gene’ (−i gene). The underlying gene annotation was the same as used for the mapping.

Differences in transcript abundance were identified with the Bioconductor package DESeq2 (v.1.6.3) [42]. The fitType was set to ‘parametric’. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 was used as threshold for significance of differential transcript abundance for the comparisons heifer vs. non-lactating and heifer vs. lactating cows.

Data were analyzed in two steps. Transcriptomic differences in the oviduct epithelium (isthmus and ampulla) were compared (i) in the oviduct ipsilateral to the CL (where the embryo develops if fertilization occurs) between the three groups (heifers, postpartum lactating, postpartum nonlactating) and (ii) between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts. Venn diagrams were generated for genes with P < 0.001 from all three comparisons using the web tool JVenn [43].

Gene ontology analysis

Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed separately on DEG lists identified in the ampulla and isthmus according to location relative to the CL (within group, including DEGs shared between groups) and between groups with a P < 0.05 using Cytoscape version 3.7.0 and ClueGO/CluePedia version 2.5.3 plugins in the open source Cytoscape (cystoscape.org) platform [44]. The ClueGO plugin allows to visualize the non-redundant biological terms in a functionally grouped network. The CluePedia plugin works in conjunction with ClueGO to associate genes and proteins potentially associated to networks based on in silico and/or experimental information [45]. Background lists for this analysis includes only genes detected in the ampulla or isthmus with a median of reads count > 1. This median was calculated with all samples in the same organ to generate two distinct custom reference sets (isthmus and ampulla). The DEG lists generated were entered as up- and down-regulated in separate clusters. Ontology/Pathway identification was based on GO Biological Process (BP) and/or Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways (KEGG pathways) using GO terms fusion except if specified otherwise. The retained criteria included a GO tree level > 3, a Kappa score > 0.4 and a minimum number of 3 genes for all analyses except for the comparison between ipsilateral and contralateral ampullae from heifers, for which a minimum of 2 genes was applied (due to the total low number of DEG identified in this comparison). Only GO terms/pathways with P < 0.05 were considered.

Additional files

Additional file 1:^{(106.6KB, xlsx)}

Table S1. Exhaustive and top-20 lists of up- and down-regulated genes in post-partum lactating (L) vs. non-lactating (NL) cows, heifers (H) vs. L, and H vs. NL comparisons in the ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral to the corpus luteum on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. Lists of associated Gene Ontology (GO) terms are provided for the H vs. NL and H vs. NL comparisons in the isthmus. (XLSX 106 kb)

Additional file 2:^{(231KB, xlsx)}

Table S2. Exhaustive lists of up- and down-regulated genes in ipsilateral vs. contralateral ampulla in post-partum lactating (L), non-lactating (NL) cows and heifers (H) on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. Lists of associated Gene Ontology (GO) terms are provided for ipsilateral vs. contralateral ampullas in NL and H. (XLSX 231 kb)

Additional file 3:^{(604KB, xlsx)}

Table S3. Exhaustive and top-20 lists of up- and down-regulated genes in ipsilateral vs. contralateral isthmus in post-partum lactating (L), non-lactating (NL) cows and heifers (H) on Day 3 of the estrous cycle. Lists of associated Gene Ontology (GO) terms are provided for all comparisons. The Biological Process (BP) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways/compounds shared between the three groups are also provided. (XLSX 603 kb)

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the staff and students for their help in sample collection.

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Program FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement n° 312097 (‘FECUND’), without participation of the funding body in the study design and data analysis.

Availability of data and materials

Raw Fastq files and the read count per gene are available to the public at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE124110.

Abbreviations

BP: biological process
CL: corpus luteum
DEGs: differentially expressed genes
GO: gene ontology
KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
RIN: RNA integrity number

Authors’ contributions

PL, NF, PM, EW and YL conceived and designed the study. PM, YL, NF, PL and MSD collected the biological samples. HB, NM, YL, AG, BP and MSD acquired and analysed the data, and interpreted the results. NF, PL, YL and MSD drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures involving animals were licensed by the Department of Health and Children, Ireland, in accordance with the Cruelty to Animals Act, 1876, and the European Community Directive 86/609/EC. All procedures were sanctioned by University College Dublin’s Animals Research Ethics Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Yann Locatelli, Email: Yann.Locatelli@inra.fr.

Niamh Forde, Email: N.Forde@leeds.ac.uk.

Helmut Blum, Email: blum@genzentrum.lmu.de.

Alexander Graf, Email: Alexander.Graf@lrz.uni-muenchen.de.

Benoît Piégu, Email: benoit.piegu@inra.fr.

Pascal Mermillod, Email: pascal.mermillod@inra.fr.

Eckhard Wolf, Email: ewolf@genzentrum.lmu.de.

Patrick Lonergan, Email: pat.lonergan@ucd.ie.

Marie Saint-Dizier, Phone: +33 247367014, Email: marie.saint-dizier@univ-tours.fr.

References

1.Walsh SW, Williams EJ, Evans AC. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011;123(3–4):127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Thatcher WW, Santos JE, Silvestre FT, Kim IH, Staples CR. Perspective on physiological/endocrine and nutritional factors influencing fertility in post-partum dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(Suppl 3):2–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Hugentobler SA, Diskin MG, Leese HJ, Humpherson PG, Watson T, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Amino acids in oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the estrous cycle in the bovine. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74(4):445–454. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Hugentobler SA, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Energy substrates in bovine oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the oestrous cycle. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(3):496–503. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Hugentobler SA, Morris DG, Sreenan JM, Diskin MG. Ion concentrations in oviduct and uterine fluid and blood serum during the estrous cycle in the bovine. Theriogenology. 2007;68(4):538–548. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Lamy J, Labas V, Harichaux G, Tsikis G, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Regulation of the bovine oviductal fluid proteome. Reproduction. 2016;152(6):629–644. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Lamy J, Liere P, Pianos A, Aprahamian F, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Steroid hormones in bovine oviductal fluid during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology. 2016;86(6):1409–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Sartori R, Bastos MR, Wiltbank MC. Factors affecting fertilisation and early embryo quality in single- and superovulated dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22(1):151–158. doi: 10.1071/RD09221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Wiltbank MC, Baez GM, Garcia-Guerra A, Toledo MZ, Monteiro PL, Melo LF, Ochoa JC, Santos JE, Sartori R. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2016;86(1):239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Rizos D, Carter F, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Lonergan P. Contribution of the female reproductive tract to low fertility in postpartum lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(3):1022–1029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Maillo V, Rizos D, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Kelly AK, Garrett M, Lonergan P. Influence of lactation on metabolic characteristics and embryo development in postpartum Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(7):3865–3876. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Cerri RL, Thompson IM, Kim IH, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ, Staples CR, Li JL, Santos JE, Thatcher WW. Effects of lactation and pregnancy on gene expression of endometrium of Holstein cows at day 17 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):5657–5675. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Bauersachs S, Simintiras CA, Sturmey RG, Krebs S, Bick J, Blum H, Wolf E, Lonergan P, Forde N. Effect of metabolic status on conceptus-maternal interactions on day 19 in dairy cattle: II. Effects on the endometrial transcriptome. Biol Reprod. 2017;97(3):413–425. doi: 10.1093/biolre/iox095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Forde N, O'Gorman A, Whelan H, Duffy P, O'Hara L, Kelly AK, Havlicek V, Besenfelder U, Brennan L, Lonergan P. Lactation-induced changes in metabolic status and follicular-fluid metabolomic profile in postpartum dairy cows. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(12):1882–1892. doi: 10.1071/RD14348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Wijayagunawardane MPB, Miyamoto A, Cerbito WA, Acosta TJ, Takagi M, Sato K. Local distributions of oviductal estradiol, progesterone, prostaglandins, oxytocin and endothelin-1 in the cyclic cow. Theriogenology. 1998;49(3):607–618. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Bauersachs S, Blum H, Mallok S, Wenigerkind H, Rief S, Prelle K, Wolf E. Regulation of ipsilateral and contralateral bovine oviduct epithelial cell function in the postovulation period: a transcriptomics approach. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1170–1177. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Forde N, Simintiras CA, Sturmey RG, Graf A, Wolf E, Blum H, Lonergan P. Effect of lactation on conceptus-maternal interactions at the initiation of implantation in cattle: I. Effects on the conceptus transcriptome and amino acid composition of the uterine luminal fluid. Biol Reprod. 2017;97(6):798–809. doi: 10.1093/biolre/iox135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Thompson IM, Cerri RL, Kim IH, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ, Staples CR, Thatcher WW. Effects of lactation and pregnancy on metabolic and hormonal responses and expression of selected conceptus and endometrial genes of Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):5645–5656. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Monaco E, Gasparrini B, Boccia L, De Rosa A, Attanasio L, Zicarelli L, Killian G. Effect of osteopontin (OPN) on in vitro embryo development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2009;71(3):450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Hao Y, Murphy CN, Spate L, Wax D, Zhong Z, Samuel M, Mathialagan N, Schatten H, Prather RS. Osteopontin improves in vitro development of porcine embryos and decreases apoptosis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(2):291–298. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Li S, Winuthayanon W. Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development. J Endocrinol. 2017;232(1):R1–R26. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Cerny KL, Garrett E, Walton AJ, Anderson LH, Bridges PJ. A transcriptomal analysis of bovine oviductal epithelial cells collected during the follicular phase versus the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:84. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0077-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Nelis H, Vanden Bussche J, Wojciechowicz B, Franczak A, Vanhaecke L, Leemans B, Cornillie P, Peelman L, Van Soom A, Smits K. Steroids in the equine oviduct: synthesis, local concentrations and receptor expression. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]
24.Nelis H, Wojciechowicz B, Franczak A, Leemans B, D'Herde K, Goossens K, Cornillie P, Peelman L, Van Soom A, Smits K. Steroids affect gene expression, ciliary activity, glucose uptake, progesterone receptor expression and immunoreactive steroidogenic protein expression in equine oviduct explants in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(12):1926-1944. 10.1071/RD15044. [DOI] [PubMed]
25.Lee YL, Cheong AW, Chow WN, Lee KF, Yeung WS. Regulation of complement-3 protein expression in human and mouse oviducts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76(3):301–308. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Lee YL, Lee KF, Xu JS, He QY, Chiu JF, Lee WM, Luk JM, Yeung WS. The embryotrophic activity of oviductal cell-derived complement C3b and iC3b, a novel function of complement protein in reproduction. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(13):12763–12768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311160200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Tse PK, Lee YL, Chow WN, Luk JM, Lee KF, Yeung WS. Preimplantation embryos cooperate with oviductal cells to produce embryotrophic inactivated complement-3b. Endocrinology. 2008;149(3):1268–1276. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Klein C, Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Einspanier R, Meyer HH, Schmidt SE, Reichenbach HD, Vermehren M, Sinowatz F, Blum H, et al. Monozygotic twin model reveals novel embryo-induced transcriptome changes of bovine endometrium in the preattachment period. Biol Reprod. 2006;74(2):253–264. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Gonella-Diaza AM, Mesquita FS, da Silva KR, de Carvalho Balieiro JC, Dos Santos NP, Pugliesi G, de Francisco Strefezzi R, Binelli M. Sex steroids modulate morphological and functional features of the bovine oviduct. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;370(2):319–333. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2666-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Maillo V, Gaora PO, Forde N, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Burns GW, Spencer TE, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Oviduct-embryo interactions in cattle: two-way traffic or a one-way street? Biol Reprod. 2015;92(6):144. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.127969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Alminana C, Caballero I, Heath PR, Maleki-Dizaji S, Parrilla I, Cuello C, Gil MA, Vazquez JL, Vazquez JM, Roca J, et al. The battle of the sexes starts in the oviduct: modulation of oviductal transcriptome by X and Y-bearing spermatozoa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Maillo V, de Frutos C, O'Gaora P, Forde N, Burns GW, Spencer TE, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Spatial differences in gene expression in the bovine oviduct. Reproduction. 2016;152(1):37–46. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Einer-Jensen N, Hunter RHF. Counter-current transfer in reproductive biology. Reproduction. 2005;129(1):9–18. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Gonella-Diaza AM, Andrade SC, Sponchiado M, Pugliesi G, Mesquita FS, Van Hoeck V, Strefezzi Rde F, Gasparin GR, Coutinho LL, Binelli M. Size of the ovulatory follicle dictates spatial differences in the Oviductal transcriptome in cattle. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Gonella-Diaza AM, da Silva Andrade SC, Sponchiado M, Pugliesi G, Mesquita FS, Van Hoeck V, de Francisco Strefezzi R, Gasparin GR, Coutinho LL, Binelli M. Oviductal transcriptional profiling of a bovine fertility model by next-generation sequencing. Genom Data. 2017;13:27–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Kageyama S, Hirayama H, Kimura K, Okuda K. Regulation of bovine oviductal NO synthesis by follicular steroids and prostaglandins. Reproduction. 2016;151(6):577–587. doi: 10.1530/REP-15-0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Yamamoto Y, Kohka M, Kobayashi Y, Woclawek-Potocka I, Okuda K. Endothelin as a local regulating factor in the bovine oviduct. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(6):673–681. doi: 10.1071/RD14076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Barone R. Anatomie comparée des mammifères domestiques. Tome 4 Splanchnologie II,. In. Edited by Vigot E, vol. Troisième édition. Paris: Vigot; 2001.
39.Forde N, Beltman ME, Duffy GB, Duffy P, Mehta JP, O'Gaora P, Roche JF, Lonergan P, Crowe MA. Changes in the endometrial transcriptome during the bovine estrous cycle: effect of low circulating progesterone and consequences for conceptus elongation. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(2):266–278. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudie F, Djemiel C, Klopp C. jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Bindea G, Galon J, Mlecnik B. CluePedia Cytoscape plugin: pathway insights using integrated experimental and in silico data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(5):661–663. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1:^{(106.6KB, xlsx)}

Additional file 2:^{(231KB, xlsx)}

Additional file 3:^{(604KB, xlsx)}

Data Availability Statement

Raw Fastq files and the read count per gene are available to the public at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE124110.

[CR1] 1.Walsh SW, Williams EJ, Evans AC. A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011;123(3–4):127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Thatcher WW, Santos JE, Silvestre FT, Kim IH, Staples CR. Perspective on physiological/endocrine and nutritional factors influencing fertility in post-partum dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(Suppl 3):2–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Hugentobler SA, Diskin MG, Leese HJ, Humpherson PG, Watson T, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Amino acids in oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the estrous cycle in the bovine. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74(4):445–454. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Hugentobler SA, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Sreenan JM, Morris DG. Energy substrates in bovine oviduct and uterine fluid and blood plasma during the oestrous cycle. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(3):496–503. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Hugentobler SA, Morris DG, Sreenan JM, Diskin MG. Ion concentrations in oviduct and uterine fluid and blood serum during the estrous cycle in the bovine. Theriogenology. 2007;68(4):538–548. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Lamy J, Labas V, Harichaux G, Tsikis G, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Regulation of the bovine oviductal fluid proteome. Reproduction. 2016;152(6):629–644. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Lamy J, Liere P, Pianos A, Aprahamian F, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Steroid hormones in bovine oviductal fluid during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology. 2016;86(6):1409–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Sartori R, Bastos MR, Wiltbank MC. Factors affecting fertilisation and early embryo quality in single- and superovulated dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22(1):151–158. doi: 10.1071/RD09221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Wiltbank MC, Baez GM, Garcia-Guerra A, Toledo MZ, Monteiro PL, Melo LF, Ochoa JC, Santos JE, Sartori R. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2016;86(1):239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Rizos D, Carter F, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Lonergan P. Contribution of the female reproductive tract to low fertility in postpartum lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(3):1022–1029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Maillo V, Rizos D, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Kelly AK, Garrett M, Lonergan P. Influence of lactation on metabolic characteristics and embryo development in postpartum Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(7):3865–3876. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Cerri RL, Thompson IM, Kim IH, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ, Staples CR, Li JL, Santos JE, Thatcher WW. Effects of lactation and pregnancy on gene expression of endometrium of Holstein cows at day 17 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):5657–5675. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Bauersachs S, Simintiras CA, Sturmey RG, Krebs S, Bick J, Blum H, Wolf E, Lonergan P, Forde N. Effect of metabolic status on conceptus-maternal interactions on day 19 in dairy cattle: II. Effects on the endometrial transcriptome. Biol Reprod. 2017;97(3):413–425. doi: 10.1093/biolre/iox095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Forde N, O'Gorman A, Whelan H, Duffy P, O'Hara L, Kelly AK, Havlicek V, Besenfelder U, Brennan L, Lonergan P. Lactation-induced changes in metabolic status and follicular-fluid metabolomic profile in postpartum dairy cows. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(12):1882–1892. doi: 10.1071/RD14348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Wijayagunawardane MPB, Miyamoto A, Cerbito WA, Acosta TJ, Takagi M, Sato K. Local distributions of oviductal estradiol, progesterone, prostaglandins, oxytocin and endothelin-1 in the cyclic cow. Theriogenology. 1998;49(3):607–618. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Bauersachs S, Blum H, Mallok S, Wenigerkind H, Rief S, Prelle K, Wolf E. Regulation of ipsilateral and contralateral bovine oviduct epithelial cell function in the postovulation period: a transcriptomics approach. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(4):1170–1177. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.010660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Forde N, Simintiras CA, Sturmey RG, Graf A, Wolf E, Blum H, Lonergan P. Effect of lactation on conceptus-maternal interactions at the initiation of implantation in cattle: I. Effects on the conceptus transcriptome and amino acid composition of the uterine luminal fluid. Biol Reprod. 2017;97(6):798–809. doi: 10.1093/biolre/iox135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Thompson IM, Cerri RL, Kim IH, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ, Staples CR, Thatcher WW. Effects of lactation and pregnancy on metabolic and hormonal responses and expression of selected conceptus and endometrial genes of Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):5645–5656. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Monaco E, Gasparrini B, Boccia L, De Rosa A, Attanasio L, Zicarelli L, Killian G. Effect of osteopontin (OPN) on in vitro embryo development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2009;71(3):450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Hao Y, Murphy CN, Spate L, Wax D, Zhong Z, Samuel M, Mathialagan N, Schatten H, Prather RS. Osteopontin improves in vitro development of porcine embryos and decreases apoptosis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008;75(2):291–298. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Li S, Winuthayanon W. Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development. J Endocrinol. 2017;232(1):R1–R26. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Cerny KL, Garrett E, Walton AJ, Anderson LH, Bridges PJ. A transcriptomal analysis of bovine oviductal epithelial cells collected during the follicular phase versus the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:84. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0077-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Nelis H, Vanden Bussche J, Wojciechowicz B, Franczak A, Vanhaecke L, Leemans B, Cornillie P, Peelman L, Van Soom A, Smits K. Steroids in the equine oviduct: synthesis, local concentrations and receptor expression. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR24] 24.Nelis H, Wojciechowicz B, Franczak A, Leemans B, D'Herde K, Goossens K, Cornillie P, Peelman L, Van Soom A, Smits K. Steroids affect gene expression, ciliary activity, glucose uptake, progesterone receptor expression and immunoreactive steroidogenic protein expression in equine oviduct explants in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(12):1926-1944. 10.1071/RD15044. [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR25] 25.Lee YL, Cheong AW, Chow WN, Lee KF, Yeung WS. Regulation of complement-3 protein expression in human and mouse oviducts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009;76(3):301–308. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Lee YL, Lee KF, Xu JS, He QY, Chiu JF, Lee WM, Luk JM, Yeung WS. The embryotrophic activity of oviductal cell-derived complement C3b and iC3b, a novel function of complement protein in reproduction. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(13):12763–12768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311160200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Tse PK, Lee YL, Chow WN, Luk JM, Lee KF, Yeung WS. Preimplantation embryos cooperate with oviductal cells to produce embryotrophic inactivated complement-3b. Endocrinology. 2008;149(3):1268–1276. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Klein C, Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Einspanier R, Meyer HH, Schmidt SE, Reichenbach HD, Vermehren M, Sinowatz F, Blum H, et al. Monozygotic twin model reveals novel embryo-induced transcriptome changes of bovine endometrium in the preattachment period. Biol Reprod. 2006;74(2):253–264. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Gonella-Diaza AM, Mesquita FS, da Silva KR, de Carvalho Balieiro JC, Dos Santos NP, Pugliesi G, de Francisco Strefezzi R, Binelli M. Sex steroids modulate morphological and functional features of the bovine oviduct. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;370(2):319–333. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2666-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Maillo V, Gaora PO, Forde N, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Burns GW, Spencer TE, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Oviduct-embryo interactions in cattle: two-way traffic or a one-way street? Biol Reprod. 2015;92(6):144. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.127969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Alminana C, Caballero I, Heath PR, Maleki-Dizaji S, Parrilla I, Cuello C, Gil MA, Vazquez JL, Vazquez JM, Roca J, et al. The battle of the sexes starts in the oviduct: modulation of oviductal transcriptome by X and Y-bearing spermatozoa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Maillo V, de Frutos C, O'Gaora P, Forde N, Burns GW, Spencer TE, Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Spatial differences in gene expression in the bovine oviduct. Reproduction. 2016;152(1):37–46. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Einer-Jensen N, Hunter RHF. Counter-current transfer in reproductive biology. Reproduction. 2005;129(1):9–18. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Gonella-Diaza AM, Andrade SC, Sponchiado M, Pugliesi G, Mesquita FS, Van Hoeck V, Strefezzi Rde F, Gasparin GR, Coutinho LL, Binelli M. Size of the ovulatory follicle dictates spatial differences in the Oviductal transcriptome in cattle. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Gonella-Diaza AM, da Silva Andrade SC, Sponchiado M, Pugliesi G, Mesquita FS, Van Hoeck V, de Francisco Strefezzi R, Gasparin GR, Coutinho LL, Binelli M. Oviductal transcriptional profiling of a bovine fertility model by next-generation sequencing. Genom Data. 2017;13:27–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Kageyama S, Hirayama H, Kimura K, Okuda K. Regulation of bovine oviductal NO synthesis by follicular steroids and prostaglandins. Reproduction. 2016;151(6):577–587. doi: 10.1530/REP-15-0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Yamamoto Y, Kohka M, Kobayashi Y, Woclawek-Potocka I, Okuda K. Endothelin as a local regulating factor in the bovine oviduct. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(6):673–681. doi: 10.1071/RD14076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Barone R. Anatomie comparée des mammifères domestiques. Tome 4 Splanchnologie II,. In. Edited by Vigot E, vol. Troisième édition. Paris: Vigot; 2001.

[CR39] 39.Forde N, Beltman ME, Duffy GB, Duffy P, Mehta JP, O'Gaora P, Roche JF, Lonergan P, Crowe MA. Changes in the endometrial transcriptome during the bovine estrous cycle: effect of low circulating progesterone and consequences for conceptus elongation. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(2):266–278. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudie F, Djemiel C, Klopp C. jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Bindea G, Galon J, Mlecnik B. CluePedia Cytoscape plugin: pathway insights using integrated experimental and in silico data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(5):661–663. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Relative effects of location relative to the corpus luteum and lactation on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium

Yann Locatelli

Niamh Forde

Helmut Blum

Alexander Graf

Benoît Piégu

Pascal Mermillod

Eckhard Wolf

Patrick Lonergan

Marie Saint-Dizier

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusions

Electronic supplementary material

Background

Results

Fig. 1.

Plasma progesterone levels according to the metabolic status

Effect of lactation on the transcriptome of the oviduct epithelium in the ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral to the corpus luteum

In the ampulla

Fig. 2.

In the isthmus

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Effect of location relative to the corpus luteum on the transcriptome of oviduct epithelium in the ampulla and isthmus

Fig. 5.

In the ampulla

Fig. 6.

In the isthmus

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Discussion

Effect of metabolism on oviduct epithelial gene expression

Effect of the location relative to the CL on oviduct gene expression

Conclusions

Methods

Animals

Sample processing

Measurement of serum progesterone concentrations

Transcriptomic analysis

RNA-sequencing and data analysis

Gene ontology analysis

Additional files

Acknowledgements

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Abbreviations

Authors’ contributions

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Contributor Information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases