Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;116(4):541–562. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000154

Table 2. Analyses of Group Ratings in Four One-Way ANOVAs and Post Hoc Tests (Study 3).

Dependent variables Normal M (SD) Restricted M (SD) Unrestricted M (SD) ANOVAs Pairwise comparisons with PCR [95% CI]/d
F dfs η^G2 N-R N-U R-U
Note. CI = confidence interval; PCR = percentage of common responses; ANOVA = analysis of variance; AE = absolute effect; B = British people; P = Polish people; IOS = inclusion of the other in the self scale (Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992); Restricted (R) = restricted bar-plots; normal (N) = superimposed normal distributions; unrestricted (U) = unrestricted bar-plots; N-R = pairwise comparison of normal and restricted condition with PCR and Cohen’s d. AEs are omitted for brevity.
* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.
Similarity of B and p values 67.75 (16.04) 25.66 (19.69) 73.91 (12.59) 214.68*** 2, 247 .63 24 [13, 35]/2.34*** 83 [72, 95]/0.43* 15 [6, 26]/2.91***
How easy do B and P get along? 79.01 (14.13) 59.99 (22.34) 77.67 (18.57) 27.25*** 2, 247 .18 61 [50, 72]/1.02*** 97 [85, 100]/0.08 67 [54, 79]/0.86***
IOS scale 5.42 (1.30) 3.65 (1.32) 5.20 (1.39) 43.84*** 2, 247 .26 50 [38, 61]/1.35*** 93 [81, 100]/0.17 57 [44, 69]/1.14***
Overall B evaluation of Ps 76.92 (16.43) 68.29 (20.72) 76.64 (16.85) 3.71* 2, 148 .05 82 [66, 97]/0.46* 99 [82, 100]/0.02 83 [68, 97]/0.44*