Table 3. Results of 12 One-Way ANOVAs and Pairwise Comparisons.
| Dependent variables | Normal M (SD) | Barplots M (SD) | Line-graph M (SD) | ANOVA | Pairwise comparisons with PCR [95% CI]/d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | N-B | N-L | B-L | |||||
| Note. CI = confidence interval; PCR = percentage of common responses; ANOVA = analysis of variance; AE = absolute effect; Moral foundations = conservatives and liberals are compared; intelligent quotient = religious and nonreligious people are compared; barplots (B) = restricted bar-plots; normal (N) = superimposed normal distributions; line-graph (L); N-B, N-L, and B-L = pairwise comparisons between the three conditions with PCR and Cohen’s d. AEs are omitted for brevity. ANOVA dfs for MF: 2/152–154, dfs for IQ: 1/153–154. | ||||||||
| * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001. | ||||||||
| Moral foundations | ||||||||
| How similar are A and B | 49.36 (19.54) | 16.67 (21.66) | 39.50 (20.90) | 34.31*** | .31 | 43 [24, 59]/1.59*** | 81 [64, 96]/0.49* | 59 [41, 75]/1.07*** |
| Ease of getting along | 48.77 (20.88) | 24.67 (18.68) | 40.37 (17.73) | 21.22*** | .22 | 54 [39, 69]/1.22*** | 83 [67, 97]/0.43* | 67 [51, 82]/0.86*** |
| Do findings make sense? | 72.27 (20.79) | 61.02 (27.09) | 78.25 (20.20) | 7.52*** | .09 | 82 [67, 96]/0.47* | 88 [73, 99]/−0.29 | 72 [57, 86]/0.72*** |
| Overall impression? | 69.08 (20.20) | 59.33 (27.70) | 71.60 (20.25) | 4.10* | .05 | 84 [69, 98]/0.40* | 95 [78, 100]/−0.12 | 80 [66, 95]/0.51* |
| Quality of study? | 64.06 (20.36) | 53.54 (24.91) | 64.92 (20.20) | 4.36* | .05 | 82 [67, 96]/0.46* | 98 [82, 100]/−0.04 | 80 [66, 95]/0.50* |
| Were researchers biased? | 48.02 (23.21) | 54.13 (28.02) | 39.18 (22.81) | 4.73* | .06 | 91 [75, 100]/−0.24 | 85 [69, 98]/0.38 | 77 [62, 92]/0.58** |
| Intelligence quotient | ||||||||
| How similar are A and B | 72.54 (18.35) | 36.53 (29.77) | 83.17*** | .35 | 47 [34, 59]/1.46*** | |||
| Ease of getting along | 66.96 (22.28) | 47.11 (23.67) | 28.94*** | .16 | 67 [54, 79]/0.86*** | |||
| Do findings make sense? | 68.10 (24.52) | 60.60 (27.87) | 3.17 | .02 | 89 [76, 99]/0.29 | |||
| Overall impression? | 61.83 (24.48) | 57.89 (29.30) | .83 | .01 | 94 [82, 100]/0.15 | |||
| Quality of study? | 60.86 (21.62) | 50.74 (26.60) | 6.84** | .04 | 83 [71, 96]/0.42** | |||
| Were researchers biased? | 47.56 (23.10) | 54.64 (27.61) | 3.01 | .02 | 89 [76, 99]/−0.28 | |||