Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214329

Table 1. Prevalence of analgesic use according to the sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of the sample.

PNAUM, 2014 (n = 41,433).

Sample Prevalence of analgesic use
% %a 95% CI Pb
Total - 22.8 21.4–24.2 -
Gender Male 47.2 17.9 16.5–19.3 <0.001
Female 52.8 27.2 25.6–28.9
Age (years) 0 to 9 13.7 13.9 12.4–15.6 <0.001
10 to 19 16.0 15.7 13.6–17.9
20 to 59 57.2 25.1 23.5–26.8
≥ 60 13.2 30.0 28.8–32.4
Education (years completed) never studied 21.1 20.9 19.2–22.8 <0.001
1 to 8 45.6 21.0 19.5–22.7
> 8 33.3 26.5 24.5–28.5
Economic classc A/B 22.3 23.0 20.8–25.3 0.413
C 55.3 23.2 21.6–24.8
D/E 22.3 21.8 20.0–23.7
Chronic diseases None 69.1 17.1 15.9–18.4 <0.001
1 17.0 28.5 26.3–30.8
2 7.2 36.8 34.1–39.7
≥ 3 6.6 52.6 49.8–55.4
Number of drugs in use (excluding analgesics) None 58.6 16.0 14.7–17.4 <0.001
1 14.8 26.6 24.6–28.7
2 13.0 27.5 25.2–29.8
3 to 4 9.2 39.2 36.5–42.1
≥ 5 4.3 52.8 49.3–56.3
Health insurance coverage Yes 22.0 26.1 23.9–28.3 <0.001
No 78.0 21.9 20.4–23.4
Emergency visitsd Yes 14.8 42.4 40.2–44.7 <0.001
No 85.2 19.4 18.1–20.8
Hospitalizations d Yes 5.9 39.9 37.1–42.8 <0.001
No 94.1 21.8 20.4–23.2

a Percentages adjusted according to sample weights and according to post-stratification (according to age and gender).

b Chi-square test for independence.

c According to the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria 2013 (CCEB 2013) of the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP). Available at: http://www.abep.org

d within the previous 12 months

CI: confidence interval