Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Linguist Phon. 2018 Nov 28;33(5):479–495. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1550813

Table 1.

Mean age and results of speech evaluation (SD in parenthesis).

Variable AOS, n=7 APH, n=9 NTC, n=19
Age (years) 59.3 (17.0) 65.4 (9.8) 63.6 (12.5)
Aphasia Severity (percentile)a 45.9 (16.9) 75.8 (15.9) NA
Phonemic edit distance ratio 25.7 (10.4) 6.5 (6.1) NA
Distorted segments (%)b 15.7 (4.8) 10.1 (5.0) NA
Single word intelligibiltyc 68.3 (8.5) 86.3 (5.9) 96.0 (3.4)
Multisyllabic WSD (ms)d 428.2 (160.1) 236.6 (36.6) 232.0 (31.1)
Single word PVIdure 11.5 (60.1) 30.2 (28.2) 113.0 (15.5)

Note:

a

From the Aphasia Diagnostic Profiles

b

Percent phonemes on the motor speech evaluation that were produced with one or more distortion errors, as determined by narrow phonetic transcription.

c

From the CHMIT-e

d

From six multisyllabic words produced during the motor speech evaluation.

e

From nucleus duration data for five repetitions of the word ‘catastrophe’.

Data were not available on this measure for four speakers (three in the AOS group, one in the APH group) who declined repeating this word. NA=Not Applicable, because measures were not derived for the neurotypical control group.