Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan 11;41(4):380–389. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1564813

Table 2.

Group Differences in RT under Increasing Uncertainty Load.

Block 1 (Practice) Block 2 (Test)
CN AD t CN AD t
Externally Cued Task
 1.00 bits 38.9 (6.2) 57.1 (29.6) 2.09 44.3 (5.8) 73.8 (36.0) 3.03**
 1.59 bits 41.1 (8.5) 70.2 (36.4) 2.70* 49.9 (6.9) 95.4 (53.8) 2.92*
 2.00 bits 39.7 (8.5) 71.0 (36.4) 2.81* 53.8 (5.5) 102.9 (50.8) 3.33**
 2.32 bits 39.7 (8.7) 67.8 (26.6) 3.49** 68.2 (17.7) 122.3 (65.3) 2.79*
Internally Cued Task
 0.49 bits 47.2 (7.4) 62.0 (26.8) 1.91 44.6 (7.3) 57.6 (21.3) 2.07
 1.37 bits 53.3 (12.2) 53.5 (17.4) 1.88 50.3 (9.7) 61.6 (15.8) 2.15*
 2.06 bits 57.8 (7.6) 76.4 (14.7) 4.02*** 54.3 (6.1) 72.7 (13.9) 4.34***
 2.32 bits 59.0 (7.7) 79.2 (26.6) 2.62* 56.8 (6.1) 77.7 (24.3) 3.00**

Note. Values represent M(SD). In the externally cued task condition, Block 1 consisted of a blank deck of cards sorted into the specified number of piles; this served as a control for psychomotor speed. CN = cognitively normal; AD = Alzheimer’s Disease.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001