Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 19;31(3):211–216. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.211

Table 2. Comparison of outcome measures between and within ErCG and CG at both baseline and week 8.

Outcome measure ErCG (Mean ± SD) CG (Mean ± SD)
FAC
Baseline 2.8 ± 0.6 2.9 ± 0.7
Week 8 4.0 ± 0.8# 3.1 ± 1.3
AV (m/s)
Baseline 0.64 ± 0.18* 0.46 ± 0.22
Week 8 0.74 ± 0.18#* 0.49 ± 0.24
6-MWT (m)
Baseline 278.7 ± 58.06 251.7 ± 56.1
Week 8 310.6 ± 63.9#* 268.5 ± 55.1
HR (bpm)
Baseline 75.0 ± 9.1 81.2 ± 4.0
Week 8 72.3 ± 6.3* 79.3 ± 1.9
SBP (mmHg)
Baseline 133.9 ± 12.2 134.0 ± 8.1
Week 8 123.0 ± 7.4#* 133.1 ± 8.3
DBP (mmHg)
Baseline 82.0 ± 7.2 83.6 ± 7.5
Week 8 73.2 ± 9.0#* 81.8 ± 8.7

ErCG: ergometer cycling group; CG: control group; FAC: functional ambulatory category; AV: ambulatory velocity; 6-MWT: 6-Minute Walk Test; HR: heart rate; bpm: beats per minute; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; mmHg: millimetres of Mercury; Mean ± SD: mean plus or minus standard deviation. *significant differences in outcome measures between ErCG and CG at both baseline and week 8. #significant differences in outcome measures from baseline to week 8 in ErCG.