Table 3.
Metabolic and physiological responses at the studied submaximal intensity levels (50%HRmax, 75%HRmax) of the incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion for the three groups: normal weight (NW), overweight (OW), and obese (OB) adolescents.
NW (N = 15) | OW (N = 15) | OB (N = 15) | Group effect (df = 2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | ||||
At 50%HRmax | |||||
O2net (L⋅min-1) | 1.32 (0.02) | 1.68 (0.02)a | 1.81 (0.02)a,b | 42.1 | <0.0001 |
PO (W) | 80 (5) | 80 (10) | 80 (10) | 1.3 | 0.31 |
Lactate (mmol⋅L-1) | 3.9 (1.9) | 3.8 (1.7) | 4.1 (1.1) | 2.6 | 0.36 |
HR (beats⋅min-1) | 104.7 (2.1) | 106.2 (3.1) | 102.9 (6.1) | 0.6 | 0.54 |
RER | 0.78 (0.05) | 0.82 (0.04)a | 0.89 (0.07)a,b | 11.2 | <0.01 |
%LO | 48 (2) | 39 (1)a | 22 (3)a,b | 20.2 | <0.0001 |
%CHO | 52 (2) | 61 (1)a | 78 (3)a,b | 20.1 | <0.0001 |
E(W) | 458 (11) | 562 (32)a | 615 (14)a,b | 30.1 | <0.0001 |
Epinephrines (nmol⋅L-1) | 1.61 (0.1) | 0.98 (0.2)a | 0.82 (0.1)a,b | 8.6 | <0.01 |
Norepinephrines (nmol⋅L-) | 5.4 (0.3) | 4.2 (0.3)a | 3.9 (0.4)a,b | 19.4 | <0.001 |
At 75%HRmax | |||||
O2net (L⋅min-1) | 2.01 (0.04) | 2.02 (0.02) | 2.01 (0.03) | 2.1 | 0.22 |
PO (W) | 140 (5) | 120 (10)a | 120 (10)a | 11.8 | <0.001 |
Lactate (mmol⋅L-1) | 6.9 (1.9) | 6.8 (1.7) | 6.1 (1.1) | 2.6 | 0.36 |
HR (beats⋅min-1) | 144.2 (2.2) | 152.2 (2.1) | 148.9 (2.1) | 0.9 | 0.56 |
RER | 0.89 (0.05) | 0.87 (0.04) | 0.87 (0.07) | 1.6 | 0.64 |
%LO | 8 (2) | 9 (1) | 8 (3) | 11.2 | 0.46 |
%CHO | 92 (2) | 91 (1) | 92 (3) | 3.1 | 1.1 |
E (W) | 685 (12) | 684 (12) | 681 (19) | 2.1 | 2.2 |
Epinephrines (nmol⋅L-1) | 2.01 (0.1) | 1.81 (0.2) | 1.51 (0.4)a,b | 6.6 | <0.01 |
Norepinephrines (nmol⋅L-1) | 7.4 (0.2) | 5.9 (0.3)a | 5.3 (0.1)a,b | 11.1 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean (standard deviation). O2net: oxygen consumption above the resting level, PO: power output, HR: heart rate, RER: respiratory exchange ratio, %LO: percent contribution of lipid oxidation to energy, %CHO: percent contribution of carbohydrate oxidation to energy, E: energy consumption. aSignificant difference with NW (p < 0.01). bSignificant difference with OW (p < 0.01).