Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 4;50(2):230–244. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0836-2

Table 1.

Sample characteristics for face-to-face and online training groups

Variable Study 1
FFT
(n = 233)
Study 2
OT
(n = 356)
M (SD) M (SD)
Age 39.2 (11.4) 38.2 (11.2)
Years of experience 9.1 (7.7) 8.8 (8.2)
Variable Study 1
FFT
(n = 233)
Study 2
OT
(n = 356)
n (%) n (%)
Female 197 (84.5) 305 (85.7)
Direct work with families 191 (82.7) 318 (89.3)
Previous training in engaging fathers 45 (19.2) 67 (18.8)
Profession
 Psychologist 63 (27.3) 167 (46.9)
 Social worker 49 (21.2) 49 (13.8)
 Counsellor 18 (7.8) 14 (3.9)
 Caseworker 18 (7.8) 20 (5.6)
 Family support worker 18 (7.8) 38 (10.7)
 Nurse 6 (2.6) 20 (5.6)
 Manager 4 (1.7) 9 (2.5)
 Educator 12 (5.2) 8 (2.2)
 Mediator 4 (1.7) 7 (2.0)
 Other 39 (16.9) 24 (6.7)
Organization type
 Child/family mental health 47 (20.2) 46 (12.9)
 Other government 29 (12.4) 68 (19.1)
 Non-government organization 119 (51.1) 133 (37.4)
 University 18 (7.7) 10 (2.8)
 Private practice 10 (4.3) 79 (22.2)
 Other 10 (4.3) 20 (5.6)
Location of workplacea
 New South Wales 123 (52.6) 173 (53.2)
 Queensland 20 (8.5) 65 (20.0)
 South Australia 14 (6.0) 14 (4.3)
 Victoria 10 (4.3) 55 (16.9)
 Western Australia 8 (3.4) 7 (2.2)
 Northern Territory 17 (7.3) 1 (0.3)
 Australian Capital Territory 19 (8.1) 6 (1.8)
 Tasmania 23 (9.8) 4 (1.2)

aLocation based on postcode. For OT n = 325 as some practitioners did not know postcode for workplace

FFT face-to-face training, OT online training