Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 21;10:1220. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09230-w

Table 1.

Overview of the employed datasets

Study Experiment Place Design No. subjects Field [T] TR [s] Voxel size [mm] No. voxels Time points
FCP Resting state Beijing N/A 198 3 2 3.1 × 3.1 × 3.6 64 × 64 × 33 225
Resting state Cambridge, US N/A 198 3 3 3 × 3 × 3 72 × 72 × 47 119
NKI Resting state Orangeburg, US N/A 30 3 1.4 2 × 2 × 2 112 × 112 × 64 404
Resting state Orangeburg, US N/A 30 3 0.645 3 × 3 × 3 74 × 74 × 40 900
CRIC Resting state Cambridge, UK N/A 73 3 2 3 × 3 × 3.8 64 × 64 × 32 300
neuRosim Resting state (Simulated) N/A 100 NA 2 3.1 × 3.1 × 3.6 64 × 64 × 33 225
NKI Checkerboard Orangeburg, US 20 s off + 20 s on 30 3 1.4 2 × 2 × 2 112 × 112 × 64 98
Checkerboard Orangeburg, US 20 s off + 20 s on 30 3 0.645 3 × 3 × 3 74 × 74 × 40 240
BMMR Checkerboard Magdeburg 12 s off + 12 s on 21 7 3 1 × 1 × 1 182 × 140 × 45 80
CRIC Checkerboard Cambridge, UK 16 s off + 16 s on 70 3 2 3 × 3 × 3.8 64 × 64 × 32 160
CamCAN Sensorimotor Cambridge, UK Event-related 200 3 1.97 3 × 3 × 4.44 64 × 64 × 32 261

For the enhanced NKI data, only scans from release 3 were used. Out of the 46 subjects in release 3, scans of 30 subjects were taken. For the rest, at least 1 scan was missing. For the BMMR data, there were 7 subjects at 3 sessions, resulting in 21 scans. For the CamCAN data, 200 subjects were considered only

FCP Functional Connectomes Project, NKI Nathan Kline Institute, BMMR Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, CRIC Cambridge Research into Impaired Consciousness, CamCAN Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience