Table 3.
Linear regression results of model 1.
| Variables | Number of consultations during the 60-day perioda, coefficient (95% CI) | ||||
| Model 1a | Model 1b | Model 2a | Model 2b | ||
| Control variables | |||||
|
|
Attending Physician | 0.13 (−1.143 to 1.406) | 0.41 (−0.689 to 1.504) | -1.94 (−4.941 to 1.068) | −0.79 (−3.386 to 1.809) |
| Associate Director Physician | 0.82 (−0.430 to 2.085) | 0.74 (−0.346 to 1.820) | −1.67 (−4.666 to 1.327) | −0.76 (−3.345 to 1.831) | |
| Director Physician | 0.81 (−0.076 to 1.701) | 0.78 (−0.303 to 1.859) | −1.37 (−4.364 to 1.624) | −0.66 (−3.247 to 1.923) | |
| Secondary hospital | 0.76 (−0.313 to 1.830) | 0.60 (−0.165 to 1.369) | −0.90 (−4.017 to 2.215) | −0.21 (−2.909 to 2.484) | |
| Tertiary hospital | 1.07 (−0.181 to 2.325) | 0.70 (−0.069 to 1.459) | 0.17 (−2.824 to 3.164) | 0.35 (−2.238 to 2.947) | |
| Independent variables | |||||
|
|
Contribution (log) | —b | 0.30c (0.214 to 0.375) | — | 0.37c (0.254 to 0.476) |
| Total number of homepage views (log) | — | 0.43c (0.335 to 0.536) | — | 0.46c (0.358 to 0.564) | |
| Number of votes (log) | — | 0.33c (0.206 to 0.447) | — | 0.27c (0.134 to 0.398) | |
| Thank-you messages (log) | — | 0.07 (−0.114 to 0.258) | — | 0.17 (−0.015 to 0.354) | |
| Virtual gifts (log) | — | 0.12 (−0.082 to 0.326) | — | 0.14 (−0.073 to 0.347) | |
| Constant | 0.84 (−0.597 to 2.282) | 2.90c (1.462 to 4.345) | 3.57 (−0.664 to 7.799) | 3.88d (0.163 to 7.591) | |
aModel 1a: R2=0.05, goodness of fit (F4037)=9.27. Model 1b: R2=0.28 and goodness of fit (F4037)=33.38. Model 2a: R2=0.03 and goodness of fit (F4037)=4.12. Model 2b: R2=0.27 and goodness of fit (F4037)=27.64.
bNot included in the model.
cP<.01.
dP<.05.