Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;10:186. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00186

Table 3.

Summary of the results of meta-analysis of cancer risk associated with miR-196a-2 rs11614913 and miR-149 rs2292832.

Genetic models na Cases/controls ORb (95% CI) Pc PHetd I2 Pblase
miR-196a2 rs11614913
Homozygote (TT vs. CC) 109 41,342/49,268 0.88 (0.79–0.98) 0.027 <0.0001 77.1% 0.370
Heterozygote (CT vs. CC) 111 41,673/49,570 1.00 (0.92–1.07) 0.960 <0.0001 70.4% 0.832
Dominant (TT+CT vs. CC) 111 41,673/49,570 0.96 (0.89–1.04) 0.429 <0.0001 76.8% 0.666
Recessive (TT vs. CT+CC) 109 41,342/49,268 0.89 (0.83–0.95) 0.001 <0.0001 68.6% 0.496
Allelic (T vs. C) 111 41,673/49,570 0.95 (0.90–1.00) 0.051 <0.0001 78.9% 0.148
miR-149 rs2292832
Homozygotef (TT vs. CC) 44 15,954/19,594 0.89 (0.77–1.02) 0.119 <0.0001 64.2 0.004
Heterozygote (CT vs. CC) 44 15,954/19,594 0.96 (0.87–1.05) 0.427 0.008 37.1 0.478
Dominant (CT+TT vs. CC) 44 15,954/19,594 1.00 (0.90–1.11) 0.955 <0.0001 53.5 0.175
Recessivef (TT vs. CC+CT) 44 15,954/19,594 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.907 <0.0001 48.6 0.045
Allelic (T vs. C)f 44 15,954/19,594 0.96 (0.88–1.04) 0.358 <0.0001 73.6 0.026
a

Number of studies in each contrast.

b

Pooled OR and 95% CI (Random-effect model).

c

P-value of the Z-test.

d

P-value of the Q-test.

e

P-value of the Begg's test.

f

For these models (homozygote, recessive, and allelic comparisons of rs2292832) “trim and fill” adjusted results are shown (consult with Supplementary Figure S4 for forest plots and Supplementary Figure S11 for funnel plots of these models).

Significant associations are shown in boldface.