Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 26;20(5):1016. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051016

Table 2.

Distribution and correlation of total, nuclear, and cytoplasmic AhR expression in the whole cohort and in the lymph node-negative versus lymph node-positive BC.

Whole Cohort
(n = 302)
Lymph Node-Negative
(n = 162)
Lymph Node-Positive
(n = 124)
Total AhR expression
Mean IRS +/− SE 6.66 +/− 4.85 6 +/− 4.56 6.85 +/− 4.30
Low expressing tumors n (%) 27 (8.9%) 12 (7.4%) 15 (12.1%)
High expressing tumors n (%) 275 (91.1%) 150 (92.6%) 109 (87.9%)
Nuclear AhR expression
Mean IRS +/− SE 4.15 * +/− 2.92 4.10 * +/− 2.69 4.21 * +/− 2.52
Low expressing tumors n (%) 27 * (8.9%) 12 * (7.4%) 15 * (12.1%)
High expressing tumors n (%) 275 * (91.1%) 150 * (92.6%) 109* (87.9%)
Cytoplasmic AhR expression
Mean IRS +/− SE 2.51 * +/− 2.67 2.41 * +/− 2.64 2.65 *+/− 2.28
Low expressing tumors n (%) 125 * (41.4%) 69 * (42.6%) 57 *(46%)
High expressing tumors n (%) 177 * (58.6%) 93 * (57.4%) 67 *(54%)
Correlation between nuclear and cytoplasmic AhR
Correlation coefficient 0.539 *** 0.476 *** 0.618 ***
p values 5.66 10−23 1.57 10−10 2.09 10−14

The cut-off value between low and high expression was defined as an IRS ≥ 2 (total) or ≥ 1 (nuclear and cytoplasmic). Mean IRS and percentages of low and high expressing tumors were compared for nuclear and cytoplasmic expression in the whole cohort and in each sub-group. Differences or correlations were statistically significant for p < 0.05 (*) or p < 0.001 (***), using mean or percentage bilateral analysis and Spearman-Rho-Test.