Table 3.
Ranking | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus Group | Activity | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Patients | Individuala | How well established the treatment is (Scored: 43) | Reputation of the oncologist, cancer center, group (Scored: 46) | Lifestyle modifications (Scored: 53) |
Groupa | How well established the treatment is (6 votes) | Reputation of the oncologist, cancer center, group (3 votes) | Alternative options (3 votes) | |
Physicians | Individuala | Burden and inconvenience to patients (Scored: 28) | Financial toxicity (Scored: 29) | Burden and inconvenience on family and caregivers (Scored: 40) |
Groupa | Financial toxicity (5 votes) | Burden and inconvenience to patients (4 votes) | Societal costs and consequences (2 votes) | |
Nurses | Individuala | Communication (Scored: 60) | Patient expectations (Scored: 63) | Barriers (Scored: 67) |
Groupa | Communication (6 votes) | Innovation (6 votes) | Patient expectations (4 votes) |
“Individual” refers to the participants’ silent (private) ranking, while “group” denotes the public voting process.