Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025173

Table 3.

Individual evaluation of included decision aids (n=25)

ID Patient Education Material Evaluation Tool for Print Materials ratings International Patient Decision Aids Standards ratings Readability ratings
Understandability
(0–100)
Actionability
(0–100)
V3-SF overall
score (0–100)
V4 quality criteria
rated ≥3 (23 items)
Gunning
Fog (0–20)
Flesch reading
ease (0–100)
DA_01 94.1 66.7 60.9 10 8.3 63.9
DA_02 93.8 83.3 72.7 9 9.9 63.7
DA_03 92.9 71.4 81.3 11 7.8 73.9
DA_04 92.9 71.4 81.3 12 8.8 70.9
DA_05 92.9 71.4 81.3 6 8.5 65.4
DA_06 85.7 60.0 51.6 4 8.0 69.7
DA_07 92.9 16.7 64.8 7 10.9 55.4
DA_08 85.7 20.0 64.8 7 9.7 63.4
DA_09 82.4 66.7 65.6 9 10.3 59.4
DA_10 75.0 60.0 46.1 1 11.8 46.1
DA_11 76.9 60.0 46.9 2 11.1 48.6
DA_12 88.2 83.3 61.7 7 7.2 76.0
DA_13 88.2 83.3 61.7 7 7.2 75.7
DA_14 88.2 83.3 61.7 7 7.1 76.3
DA_15 81.3 33.3 63.3 7 11.1 63.4
DA_16 81.3 33.3 63.3 7 11.1 62.3
DA_17 81.3 33.3 63.3 7 11.4 61.9
DA_18 73.3 60.0 71.9 10 13.7 37.1
DA_19 80.0 60.0 71.9 11 13.2 40.4
DA_20 94.1 100.0 69.5 9 11.8 56.7
DA_21 81.3 33.3 69.5 8 11.4 63.0
DA_22 87.5 20.0 65.6 7 11.6 57.8
DA_23 100.0 100.0 78.9 6 9.0 66.9
DA_24 94.1 80.0 41.4 3 7.7 66.5
DA_25 94.1 80.0 53.1 6 10.0 60.5