Table 1.
Study | Design | Location, funding | Prior treatments | Intervention | N | Type | Median age years | Male % | ECOG 0/1% | Treatment duration (follow-up) months |
AXIS20 | PIII OL RCT | 175 sites in 22 countries, Pfizer |
One prior systemic treatment (sunitinib, cytokine or other), prior sunitinib subgroup 54% | Axitinib | 361 | CC | 61 | 73 | 99 | 8.2 (NR) |
Sorafenib | 362 | 61 | 71 | 100 | 5.2 (NR) | |||||
CheckMate 02514 | PIII OL RCT | 146 sites in 24 countries, BMS |
One or two prior targeted treatments (TKI or other, no mTORi) | Nivolumab | 410 | CC | 62 | 77 | NR | 5.5 (NR) |
Everolimus | 411 | 62 | 74 | 3.7 (NR) | ||||||
HOPE 20515 | PII OL RCT | 37 sites in Czech Republic, Poland, Spain, UK, US, Eisai |
one prior TKI, no prior mTORi | Lenvatinib+eve | 51 | CC | 61 | 69 | 100 | 7.6 (NR) |
Everolimus | 50 | 59 | 76 | 100 | 4.1 (NR) | |||||
METEOR13 | PIII OL RCT | 173 sites in 26 countries, Exelixis |
one or more prior TKIs; no prior mTORi | Cabozantinib | 330 | CC | 63* | 77 | 100 | 8.3 (18.7) |
Everolimus | 328 | 62* | 73 | 100 | 4.4 (18.8) | |||||
RECORD-128 | PIII DB RCT, Novartis |
86 sites in Australia, Canada Europe, Japan, US, Novartis |
one or two prior TKIs; no prior mTORi | Everolimus | 277 | CC | 61* | 78 | NR | 4.6 (NR) |
BSC/placebo | 139 | 60* | 76 | 1.9 (NR) | ||||||
Guida 201732 | Chart review | One site in France, NR |
One prior targeted treatment (TKI or other) | Everolimus | 81 | 92% CC | 57 | 69 | 85 | NR (33) |
Axitinib | 45 | 54 | 78 | 82 | NR (26) | |||||
Heng 201619 | Chart review | UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Novartis |
One prior TKI (sunitinib or pazopanib) | Everolimus | 115 | NR | 60.2 | 66.7 | 91.8%≤2 | NR (NR) |
Axitinib | 96 | NR (NR) | ||||||||
Sorafenib | 98 | NR (NR) | ||||||||
Iacovelli 201527 | Chart review | 23 sites in Italy, NR |
Two prior targeted treatments (TKI or other) | Sorafenib | 90 | CC | 63 | 74 | 81 | NR (NR) |
Everolimus | 143 | NR (NR) | ||||||||
Lakomy 201733 | Chart review | Czech national registry, † |
one prior targeted treatment (TKI or other) | Everolimus | 520 | 94% CC | 65 | 75 | 95 | 6.1 (NR) |
Sorafenib | 240 | 62 | 75 | 90 | 7.1 (NR) | |||||
SPAZO-231 | Chart review | 50 sites in Spain, Novartis |
one prior TKI (pazopanib) | Everolimus | 101 | 88% CC | 66 | 64 | NR | NR (28) |
Axitinib | 88 | 63 | 68 | |||||||
Vogelzang 201629 | Chart review | US, Novartis |
One prior TKI; no prior cytokines | Everolimus | 325 | 85% CC | 61* | 70 | 80 | NR (15*) |
Axitinib | 127 | 60* | 65 | 84 | NR (13*) | |||||
Wong 201430 | Chart review | US, Novartis |
One prior TKI; no prior mTORi, cytokines, bevacizumab | Everolimus | 233 | 91% CC | 64 | 70 | NR | NR (12.9) |
Sorafenib | 123 | 66 | 72 | NR (12.1) |
*Mean values where median was not reported.
†Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, Central European Institute of Technology, The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. RENIS registry part funded by Pfizer, Bayer and Novartis.
amRCC, advanced or metastatic RCC; BSC, best supportive care; cc, clear cell variant; mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; mTORi, mammalian target of rapamaycin inhibitor; ncc, non-clear cell variant; NR, not reported; RCT, randomised controlled trials; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Notes: ECOG percentages that do not total 100 are due to missing data.