Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443

Table 3.

Predictive factors for sensory recovery following nerve repair

Author and year Positive predictive factors for sensory recovery Factors with no impact on sensory recovery
Shaffer and Cleveland 195032 Level of injury Timing of repair
Poppen et al 197944 Age<20 Timing of repair, injury severity
Young et al 198147 Age<20<40
Mailänder et al 198843 Age<10…<60, injury severity
Experience level of surgeon
Injury mechanism
Altissimi et al 199139 Age<10<40 Digital artery injury, injury mechanism
Chaise et al 199325 Age
Kallio 199341 Age<15<40
Timing of repair<3 months<12 months
Level of injury, injury mechanism
Al-Ghazal et al 199438 Age<12, smoking status (favouring non-smokers)
Injury mechanism
Injury severity
Elias et al 199426 Age<40, injury mechanism, timing of repair
Experience level of surgeon
Injury severity, digital artery injury
Vertruyen et al 199445 Age<30, injury severity
Efstathopoulos et al 199531 Age<10 <40
Tadjalli et al 199527 Injury severity (score, combining injury mechanism, severity and other factors)
Wang et al 199646 Age<40, injury mechanism
Cheng et al 200140 Age, early sensory re-education
Hohendorff et al 20093 Smoking status, injury mechanism, Digital artery repair
Lohmeyer et al 20094 Age<20 Injury severity, smoking status
Systemic disease for example, diabetes
Fakin et al 20162 Experience level of surgeon Smoking status, age (study used adults only)
Injury mechanism, digital artery injury
Postoperative immobilisation

Factors in italics variously described as ‘predictive’ and ‘not predictive’ across different papers.