Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;9(3):e025227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025227

Table 5.

Evaluation of model usefulness

Case Diagnosis Clarity of anatomy average
(out of 10)
Clarity of abnormality average
(out of 10)
Usefulness average
(out of 10)
Effectiveness over CT scan
(from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree)
Clinicians Researchers P value Clinicians Researchers P value Clinicians Researchers P value Clinicians Researchers P value
2 Multiple anomalous coronaries 8.9±1.5 6.9±1.5 0.021* 9.4±1.4 6.9±1.5 0.006* 9.2±1.4 6.7±1.6 0.009* 4.6±0.7 3.9±0.6 0.036*
3 Coronary fistula 7.5±3.0 7.0±1.1 0.520 7.9±2.7 6.5±1.8 0.108 8.0±2.8 7.1±1.1 0.142 4.1±0.8 4.0±0 0.607
4 Bridging 8.2±2.8 7.4±0.8 0.072 8.1±2.7 7.4±0.7 0.068 8.4±2.7 7.3±0.9 0.033* 4.4±1.1 4.3±0.5 0.365
5 Separate LCX and LAD from aorta 9.2±1.4 7.2±1.2 0.010* 9.2±1.4 7.0±1.8 0.010* 9.1±1.4 7.0±1.6 0.013 4.2±0.7 3.8±0.7 0.158
6 TGA, abnormal circumflex 9.5±0.7 7.5±0.9 0.002* 9.4±0.9 7.5±0.8 0.003* 9.5±0.8 7.6±0.8 0.003* 4.8±0.5 4.4±0.5 0.221
7 Kawasaki’s aneurysm 9.2±1.4 8.1±1.1 0.041* 9.4±1.4 8.2±1.0 0.027* 9.2±1.4 8.4±0.9 0.055 4.6±0.7 4.4±0.5 0.346
8 ALCAPA 10.0±0 7.8±0.7 <0.001* 9.9±0.3 7.8±1.0 <0.001* 9.9±0.3 8.1±0.6 <0.001* 5.0±0 4.3±0.5 0.005*

* indicates statistical significance.

ALCAPA, anomalous left coronary artery from pulmonary artery; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; TGA, transposition of the great arteries.