Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;69(2):129–135. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1120-x

Table 4.

FHPD cut-off in prediction of successful vaginal births in different labour scenarios

References No. of patients (N) Patient characteristics Parity FHPD cut-off (cm) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Torkildsen et al. [13] 110 Term patients with singleton vertex with prolonged first stage Primigravidae < 4 62 85 93 43
Mohamed [14] 180 Term patient with singleton vertex who underwent induction of labour Both primigravidae and multigravidae < 4.8 84.7 84 94.7 61.8
Eggebo and Hassan [15] 150 Term patients with singleton vertex with prolonged first stage Primigravidae < 4 69 82 92 48
Yudianto et al. [16] 319 Term patient with singleton vertex in active phase of labour Both primigravidae and multigravidae < 4.35 98 80 99.6 44
Kasbaoui et al. [17] 659 Term patient with singleton vertex who had instrumental vaginal delivery Both primigravidae and multigravidae < 4 73.3 47.6 23.7 88.7
Present study (2018) 219 Term patient with singleton vertex who underwent induction of labour Both primigravidae and multigravidae ≤ 5.5 97 88.1 92.9 94.9