Table 5.
Sample ID | Stability of PEth 16:0/18:1 in whole blood stored at 4°C | Ethanol (g/kg)b | Comparison of PEth 16:0/18:1 concentrations obtained with concentrations obtained by reference laboratories | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calculated PEth 16:0/18:1 concentration (stored 0 days) | Stability in whole blood (%) | Sample ID | PEth 16:0/18:1 concentration(ng/mL) | Reference laboratory 1c | Reference laboratory 2 | ||||||
nmol/L | ng/mL | 36 daysa | 71 daysa | ng/mL | %‐diff.d | ng/mL | %‐diff.d | ||||
1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 93 | 128 | 0.0 | a | 47 | 55 | 18 | 56 | 21 |
2 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 97 | 92 | 0.0 | b | 175 | 210 | 20 | 232 | 33 |
3 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 106 | 109 | 0.0 | c | 283 | 360 | 27 | 302 | 7 |
4 | 6.2 | 4.4 | 105 | 106 | 0.0 | d | 1090 | 1430 | 31 | 1118 | 3 |
5 | 11 | 7.5 | 123 | 116 | 0.0 | e | 3395 | 4260 | 25 | 3866 | 14 |
6 | 17 | 12 | 98 | 109 | 0.0 | ||||||
7 | 22 | 16 | 104 | 90 | 0.0 | ||||||
8 | 36 | 25 | 102 | 103 | 0.0 | ||||||
9 | 42 | 30 | 108 | 113 | 0.0 | ||||||
10 | 52 | 36 | 104 | 96 | 0.0 | ||||||
11 | 73 | 51 | 98 | 96 | 0.0 | ||||||
12 | 110 | 77 | 104 | 114 | 0.0 | ||||||
13 | 124 | 87 | 95 | 92 | 0.0 | ||||||
14 | 230 | 162 | 106 | 112 | 0.0 | ||||||
15 | 279 | 196 | 130 | 128 | 0.7 | ||||||
16 | 430 | 302 | 98 | 96 | 0.0 | ||||||
17 | 598 | 420 | 99 | 100 | 0.0 | ||||||
18 | 641 | 451 | 96 | 91 | 0.0 | ||||||
19 | 765 | 538 | 96 | 94 | 0.2 | ||||||
20 | 915 | 643 | 88 | 87 | 0.9 | ||||||
21 | 1267 | 891 | 104 | 97 | 0.0 |
Diff., difference.
Stability was calculated as: Calculated concentration of blood sample stored (36 or 71 days)/calculated concentration of blood sample analyzed the day of arrival at our laboratory. In this test calibrators were prepared in Type 1 water (for all three analyses) and not in whole blood.
Ethanol concentrations were determined by immunological screening as described by Kristoffersen et al.45
PEth 16:0/18:1 concentrations determined by UHPLC‐MS/MS on a Luna Omega 1.6 μm Polar C18 column (30 × 2.1 mm ID) with a sample preparation with PPT using 2‐propanol.
%‐difference for Peth 16:0/18:1 concentrations between reference laboratory and the concentrations obtained by the developed UHPLC‐MS/MS method.