Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 3;13(2):161–168. doi: 10.5009/gnl18185

Table 3.

Comparison of Parameters for Perfusion Quantification between Benign and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Parameters Benign SETs (n=12)* GISTs (n=32) p-value
PE 419.9 (128.0–1,049.1) 860.2 (221.4–3497.7) 0.511
WiAUC 1,730.5 (610.7–6,241.1) 4,239.1 (949.3–14,802.5) 0.299
RT 6.4 (5.1–9.2) 7.3 (6.2–8.3) 0.465
mTTI 30.3 (19.3–73.5) 33.1 (21.8–58.6) 0.860
TTP 14.9 (10.2–17.1) 18.0 (14.9–690.0) 0.029
WiR 102.2 (19.8–191.1) 148.5 (45.4–690.0) 0.972
WiPI 260.3 (80.9–652.5) 540.5 (137.0–2,143.5) 0.538
WoAUC 2,620.5 (979.3–9,800.6) 6,880.9 (1,370.6–19,831.9) 0.408
WiWoAUC 4,351.0 (1,590.0–15,997.0) 11,424.5 (2,319.9–34,634.4) 0.361
FT 9.4 (8.6–15.9) 10.2 (8.5–13.8) 0.867
WoR 50.7 (9.0–100.9) 77.3 (20.4–445.6) 0.549
QOF 64.0 (34.9–84.1) 67.2 (46.5–78.9) 0.924

Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

SETs, subepithelial tumors; GISTs, gastrointestinal stromal tumors; PE, peak enhancement; WiAUC, wash-in area under the curve; RT, rise time; mTTI, mean transit time; TTP, time to peak; WiR, wash-in rate; WiPI, wash-in perfusion index; WoAUC, wash-out area under the curve; Wi-WoAUC, wash-in/wash-out area under the curve; FT, fall time; WoR, wash-out rate; QOF, quality of fit.

*

Including leiomyoma (n=5), schwannoma (n=3), glomus tumor (n=2), ectopic pancreas (n=1), and paraganglioma (n=1).