Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;11(1):135–142. doi: 10.1111/os.12416

Table 2.

The inter‐correlation matrix (P values) analyzed for the morphological parameters

Morphological parameters TFL NCVD GTH NCDF OSA NCDS OSH NSA ATA NCHD OSV
FHD 0.68 −0.29 0.08 0.20 0.29 0.07 0.27 0.11 −0.09 0.08 0.52
TFL −0.03 −0.09 0.03 0.31 0.12 0.30 −0.05 −0.23 −0.03 0.75
NCVD −0.55 −0.43 −0.62 0.27 −0.56 0.21 0.00 −0.05 0.25
GTH 0.38 0.39 −0.18 0.41 −0.62 −0.02 −0.04 −0.54
NCDF 0.26 0.03 0.25 −0.07 0.06 0.11 −0.10
OSA −0.11 0.92 −0.45 −0.01 0.11 0.04
NCDS 0.10 0.07 −0.14 0.77 0.19
OSH −0.49 −0.25 0.27 0.05
NSA 0.26 0.10 0.42
ATA 0.17 −0.13
NCHD 0.02

ATA, anteversion angle; FHD, femoral head diameter; GTH, greater trochanter height; NCDF, distance between the FHC and a plane parallel to the frontal plane containing the projection of the FHC to the FNA; NCHD, distance between the FHC and a plane parallel to the frontal plane containing the projection of the FHC to the FNA; NCVD, vertical distance between the FHC and a plane parallel to transversal plane containing the projection of the FHC to the FNA; NCVD, vertical distance between the FHC and a plane parallel to transversal plane containing the projection of the FHC to the FNA; NSA, neck‐shaft angle; OSA, absolute offset as the distance between FHC and femoral shaft axis; OSH, horizontal offset; OSV, vertical offset; TFL, total femur length